Reputation: 130491
is there a shorter, better way to generate 'n' length 2D array?
var a = (function(){ var i=9, arr=[]; while(i--) arr.push([]); return arr })();
a // [ [],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[] ]
** old-school short-way**:
var a = (function(a){ while(a.push([]) < 9); return a})([]);
UPDATE - Using ES2015
Array(5).fill().map(a=>[]); // will create 5 Arrays in an Array
// or
Array.from({length:5}, a=>[])
Emptying 2D array (saves memory rather)
function make2dArray(len){
var a = [];
while(a.push([]) < len);
return a;
}
function empty2dArray(arr){
for( var i = arr.length; i--; )
arr[i].length = 0;
}
// lets make a 2D array of 3 items
var a = make2dArray(3);
// lets populate it a bit
a[2].push('demo');
console.log(a); // [[],[],["demo"]]
// clear the array
empty2dArray(a);
console.log(a); // [[],[],[]]
Upvotes: 20
Views: 23555
Reputation: 233
best way to generate 2D array in js by ES6 by Array.from
function twodimension(input) {
let index = 0,
sqrt = Math.sqrt(input.length);
return Array.from({
length: sqrt
}, (nothing, i) => Array.from({
length: sqrt
}, (nothingTwo, j) => input[index++]))
}
console.log(twodimension('abcdefghijklmnopqrstupwxy'))
console.log(twodimension([1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]))
function input(length, fill) {
let getNums = length * length;
let fillNums = 1
if (fill == 'minus') {
return Array.from({
length: length
}, (nothing, i) => Array.from({
length: length
}, (nothingTwo, j) => getNums--))
} else if (fill == 'plus') {
return Array.from({
length: length
}, (nothing, i) => Array.from({
length: length
}, (nothingTwo, j) => fillNums++))
}
// you can dping snake ladders also with Array.from
if (fill === 'snakes') {
return Array.from({
length: length
}, (_, one) =>
Array.from({
length: length
}, (_, two) => getNums--)
).map((el, i) =>
i % 2 == 1 && length % 2 == 0 ? el.reverse() :
i % 2 == 0 && length % 2 == 1 ? el.reverse() : el
);
}
}
console.log(input(8, 'minus'))
console.log(input(10, 'plus'))
console.log(input(5, 'snakes'))
you do anything with Array.from, it is easy to use and fast, this is the new method in ES6 syntax
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 4789
Just discovered another ES6 way with one line expression:
Array.from({length: N}, () => [])
Array.from(arrayLike[, mapFn[, thisArg]])
More detail about its implementation/polyfill ⇢ MDN Array.from()
Yet another neat solution with help of array spread syntax
:
[...Array(N)].map(() => [])
Upvotes: 8
Reputation: 124
var x = 3, y = 5, arr = Array(y).fill();
arr = arr.map(function(){return Array(x).fill(' ')});
console.log(arr);
Upvotes: 0
Reputation:
In ES6:
(m, n, initialElementValue) => Array(m).fill(Array(n).fill(initialElementValue))
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 317
Array(cardinality).fill(0).map(function(item) {return [];});
where cardinality is the number of items you are looking at. In this case it would be 9. This was suggested by one of my colleagues actually. This is neat, I think :) This is valid from ECMA V6. Documentation: Array::fill
Upvotes: 3
Reputation: 816860
Another way:
for(var a = [];a.length < 10; a.push([])); // semicolon is mandatory here
Yet another way:
var a = []; while(a.push([]) < 10);
This works because .push()
[docs] (specification) returns the new length of the array.
That said, this is the wrong way of "reducing code". Create a dedicated function with a meaningful name and use this one. Your code will be much more understandable:
function get2DArray(size) {
size = size > 0 ? size : 0;
var arr = [];
while(size--) {
arr.push([]);
}
return arr;
}
var a = get2DArray(9);
Code is read much more often than written.
Upvotes: 25
Reputation: 146320
var a = [];
var max_length = 10;
for(var i = 0; i < max_length; ++i){
a[i] = [];
}
Upvotes: 0