Reputation: 5740
I have a gradle monolithic project with too many dependencies.
I'd like to explode it into many sub-projects and publish all sub-projects (build + sources + javadoc) + an extra project being the merge of all sub-projects.
This extra project should be like a virtual artifact with all my projects in a single jar like it is today because I don't want a too big change for my users.
The jar must not include dependencies (it is not an uber-jar) but the resulted pom.xml must contain the dependencies of all sub-projects (the generated pom.xml of the maven artifact must contain all dependencies).
The virtual artifact will include the merge of javadoc and sources too in order to respect Maven Central conventions.
Current state:
Expected state:
How can I manage it?
Upvotes: 2
Views: 1930
Reputation: 3543
We have been in exactly the same situation for some time now. We want to publish a single artifact for our clients to depend on, although internally the product is developed through a few separate component projects. I got it done eventually (with compromises), and here is what I learned:
Merging jars is not as straightforward as it looks like because there could be things like resource files within a jar that are not always namespace-ed. It is possible that two of your jars have a resource file with the same name, in which case you will have to merge the content of those files.
Javadoc is very hard to merge without accessing the original source files because it has summary pages (index pages).
So my advice would be:
Think twice, maybe what you really want is NOT a single jar, but a single dependency for your clients? These are different. You can easily have a pom only artifact. Depending on this pom only artifact will simply translates transitively into depending on individual artifacts of your component sub projects. To your client, practically, nothing is changed. Spring Boot takes this approach. To do it, you can create an empty java-library project, make all your component projects its api
dependency. You don't even need any source code in this project.
If you really want to merge into a single jar, you can try building a fat jar with customization. The customization is not to pull in 3rd party dependencies.
We use the Gradle Shadow plugin for merging jars. Its original purpose was to build a fat jar, which will include all the transitive dependencies. But it also has a special "shadow
" configuration, to which you can add dependencies if you want the dependencies to be exported into POM rather than bundled. So what you need to do:
afterEvaluate
closure, where you find the level two dependencies of the resolved transitive configuration, add them to the shadow
configuration. The reason for level-two is that level one dependencies will be your sub-project artifacts.Here is a complete example (build.gradle) of bundling vertx-web and all its dependencies within the io.vertx group:
plugins {
id 'java'
id 'maven-publish'
id 'com.github.johnrengelman.shadow' version '5.2.0'
}
group 'org.example'
version '1.0-SNAPSHOT'
repositories {
mavenCentral()
}
configurations {
bundler {
transitive = false
}
bundlerTansitive {
extendsFrom bundler
transitive = true
}
}
dependencies {
bundler "io.vertx:vertx-web:4.0.0"
bundler "io.vertx:vertx-web-common:4.0.0"
bundler "io.vertx:vertx-core:4.0.0"
bundler "io.vertx:vertx-auth-common:4.0.0"
bundler "io.vertx:vertx-bridge-common:4.0.0"
}
shadowJar {
configurations = [project.configurations.bundler]
classifier ''
}
publishing {
publications {
shadow(MavenPublication) { publication ->
project.shadow.component(publication)
}
}
}
project.afterEvaluate {
// this is needed because your sub-projects might have inter-dependencies
def isBundled = { ResolvedDependency dep ->
return configurations.bundler.dependencies.any {
dep.moduleGroup == it.group && dep.moduleName == it.name
}
}
logger.lifecycle '\nBundled artifacts and their 1st level dependencies:'
// level one dependencies
configurations.bundlerTansitive.resolvedConfiguration.firstLevelModuleDependencies.forEach {
logger.lifecycle "+--- ${it.getName()}"
// level two dependencies
it.children.findAll({ ResolvedDependency dep -> !isBundled(dep) })
.forEach { ResolvedDependency dep ->
logger.lifecycle "| +--- ${dep.name}"
project.dependencies.add('shadow', [group: dep.moduleGroup, name: dep.moduleName, version: dep.moduleVersion])
}
}
logger.lifecycle '\nExported Dependencies:'
configurations.shadow.getResolvedConfiguration().getFirstLevelModuleDependencies().forEach {
project.logger.lifecycle "+--- ${it.getName()}"
}
}
For javadoc if you don't care about the index (compromise, as I said), then it is just a jar task with a copy spec:
configurations {
javadoc {
transitive = false
}
}
dependencies {
javadoc 'com.my:component-a:1.1.0:javadoc'
javadoc 'com.my:component-b:1.1.0:javadoc'
javadoc 'com.my:component-c:1.1.0:javadoc'
javadoc 'com.my:component-d:1.1.0:javadoc'
}
task javadocFatJar(type: Jar) {
archiveClassifier.set('javadoc')
from {
configurations.javadoc.collect { it.isDirectory() ? it : zipTree(it) }
}
with jar
}
Upvotes: 4
Reputation: 76579
This cannot be done with maven-publish
directly, but one can add individual java-library
modules and package each of them with sources and docs. With Gradle this would be a simple jar
task, but when the artifacts are publicly available ...such transitive dependencies should better be provided by a meta package; nothing but Maven (Local/Central) dependencies, instead of embedded JARS. In this case, this would be just another module (which obviously would only build after having published the others).
And concerning the concept, that it would require any "merged" JavaDocs ...
https://central.sonatype.org/pages/requirements.html#supply-javadoc-and-sources
While they're referenced (Maven Central) in *.pom
, Gradle will be able to find them.
Just use repository mavenLocal()
instead of mavenCentral()
for testing purposes.
Upvotes: 0