CODEWITHSUNDEEP
c++c++17std-filesystem
Jai
Jai

Reputation: 387

Get the last file name from std::filesystem::directory_iterator() without iteration?

I am trying to get the last file name. Below code does it very elegantly. But it is iterating through all the files inside the directory. Is it possible to get the last file without iteration?

#include <filesystem>
std::string latestFileName;
for (const auto &entry : fs::directory_iterator("/media/jai/Entertainment"))
      latestFileName = entry.path();
std::cout << latestFileName << std::endl;

Edited: Files in the directory is already in alphabetically increasing order. I want to pick the latest file, which is already sure to be last file in alphabetical order. As there could be million number of files, I am trying to avoid iteration.

Upvotes: 6

Views: 1468

Answers (2)

Jai
Jai

Reputation: 387

As suggested by @theOtherMichael, sorting can't be avoided in case of std::filesystem::directory_iterator.

To keep it simple and fast considering my aim. I chose to do below steps:

#include <filesystem>
std::string latestFileName;

for (const auto &entry : fs::directory_iterator("/media/jai/Entertainment")){
    if (entry.path() > latestFileName)  // ASCII compare
        latestFileName = entry.path();
          
std::cout << latestFileName << std::endl;

In my case, file names are digits (e.g. 20201106_115500_0-19399776.jpg). I found string compare does the job.

Upvotes: 0

theOtherMichael
theOtherMichael

Reputation: 239

This isn't possible, I'm afraid, but it's also not a good idea. It's a bad idea because the order of the iteration is unspecified, and you can't guarantee that the last file is the one you want. It's not possible because std::filesystem::directory_iterator appears to be implemented internally as a singly linked list.

(via cppreference.com) The iteration order is unspecified, except that each directory entry is visited only once.

So, you gain nothing of value by accessing the last path. What is your use case? There's surely a different way to accomplish what you're trying to do.

Upvotes: 3

Related Questions