CODEWITHSUNDEEP
cgcccompilationlinkerstatic-libraries
MichaelBVaughn
MichaelBVaughn

Reputation: 25

Why do .o files appear to have a .bss section of size 0 when compiled with GCC?

While working on a C program, I altered my build to produce a .o file instead of a stand-alone binary. When doing so, I noticed that the size of the .bss section of the resulting .o file is 0, according to readelf -S even though there are clearly uninitialized globals in the source.

I can replicate this with a simple program, test.c:

char arr[42];
int main(int argc, char **argv){
  return 0;
}

The binary resulting from gcc -o test test.c has an eighty byte .bss section, according to readelf, which is roughly what I'd expect, as I expected some minor overhead.

However, if I build a .o file with gcc -c -o test.o test.c, the size of the bss section is reported as zero. Clearly I'm misunderstanding something about the nature of ELF object files, but I'm not quite sure what I'm missing.

Upvotes: 1

Views: 498

Answers (1)

koder
koder

Reputation: 2103

ELF object files have a dummy .bss segment. They can not be loaded directly (unlike an executable or shared library).

The information about the global variables is stored in the .symtab section, which is used by the linker to construct the .bss and other sections in the final binary.

Try doing readelf -s test.o to reveal the symbol table.

Upvotes: 2

Related Questions