CODEWITHSUNDEEP
htmlmeta-tags
bin2k
bin2k

Reputation: 53

which is the correct way to declare charset in HTML page?

What is the difference between these meta tags in HTML

<meta name="http-equiv" content="Content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8"/>

<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />

in w3c validation first one is not recognized but for some reason I have to use that.

Upvotes: 3

Views: 225

Answers (2)

TRiG
TRiG

Reputation: 10643

I've never seen the first one before.

Here's the simplest:

<meta charset="utf-8">

If you're using XHTML, you can also declare the charset in the XML prologue:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

By the way, the first one is new for HTML5, but a lot of work has been done to demonstrate that it works on all known extant browsers, so it's safe to use, even with an older DOCTYPE.

Upvotes: 0

&#193;lvaro Gonz&#225;lez
&#193;lvaro Gonz&#225;lez

Reputation: 146430

My guess is that the http-equiv attribute allows to specify information that would normally be provided via HTTP headers (and user agents can opt to handle it as such) while using name is a syntax to set free-form arbitrary key/value pairs with additional information about the document (author, keywords...)

Here's the spec for HTML 4:

name = name [CS] This attribute identifies a property name. This specification does not list legal values for this attribute.
http-equiv = name [CI] This attribute may be used in place of the name attribute. HTTP servers use this attribute to gather information for HTTP response message headers.

Your first example is possibly legal but it won't render any appreciable result.

Upvotes: 1

Related Questions