Reputation: 2065
I have created a custom container called goldbox
that only contains arithmetic types and I have also implemented begin
and end
member functions to iterate over the elements.
My Full Source Code:
#include <algorithm>
#include <vector>
#include <initializer_list>
#include <iostream>
#include <type_traits>
#include <ranges>
template <typename T>
concept Arithmetic = std::is_arithmetic_v<T>;
template <Arithmetic T = int>
class goldbox {
private:
template <Arithmetic Base_t>
struct Node {
Base_t data;
Node<Base_t>* prev;
Node<Base_t>* next;
};
Node<T>* head;
Node<T>* current_node;
Node<T>*& __at_node(size_t index) {
auto temp = head;
size_t count {0};
while (count < index) {
temp = temp->next;
count++;
}
current_node = temp;
return current_node;
}
Node<T>*& __get_tail() {
return __at_node(length() - 1);
}
public:
using value_type = T;
goldbox() : head{nullptr}, current_node{nullptr} {}
goldbox(std::initializer_list<T>&& list_arg) : goldbox() {
decltype(auto) list_1 = std::forward<decltype(list_arg)>(list_arg);
T temp[list_1.size()];
std::copy(list_1.begin(), list_1.end(), temp);
std::reverse(temp, temp + list_1.size());
for (const auto& elem : temp)
push_front(elem);
}
class iterator {
private:
Node<T>* node;
public:
iterator(Node<T>* arg) noexcept : node{arg} {}
iterator& operator=(Node<T>* arg) {
node = arg;
return *this;
}
iterator operator++() {
if (node)
node = node->next;
return *this;
}
iterator operator++(int) {
iterator iter = *this;
++(*this);
return iter;
}
iterator operator--() {
if (node)
node = node->prev;
return *this;
}
iterator operator--(int) {
iterator iter = *this;
--(*this);
return iter;
}
bool operator==(const iterator& other) {
return (node == other.node);
}
bool operator!=(const iterator& other) {
return (node != other.node);
}
T& operator*() {
return node->data;
}
};
iterator begin() {
return iterator{head};
}
iterator end() {
return iterator{nullptr};
}
size_t length() const {
auto temp = head;
size_t count {0};
while (temp != nullptr) {
++count;
temp = temp->next;
}
return count;
}
goldbox& push_front(T arg) {
auto new_node = new Node<T>;
new_node->data = arg;
new_node->prev = nullptr;
new_node->next = head;
if (head != nullptr)
head->prev = new_node;
head = new_node;
return *this;
}
goldbox& push_back(T arg) {
auto new_node = new Node<T>;
auto last = head;
new_node->data = arg;
new_node->next = nullptr;
if (head == nullptr){
new_node->prev = nullptr;
head = new_node;
return *this;
}
while (last->next != nullptr)
last = last->next;
last->next = new_node;
new_node->prev = last;
return *this;
}
goldbox& clear() {
auto temp = head;
Node<T>* next_temp;
while (temp != nullptr) {
next_temp = temp->next;
delete temp;
temp = next_temp;
}
head = nullptr;
return *this;
}
goldbox& pop_back() {
if (head != nullptr) {
if (length() != 1) {
delete std::move(__get_tail());
__at_node(length() - 2)->next = nullptr;
} else {
this->clear();
}
}
return *this;
}
goldbox& pop_front() {
if (head != nullptr) {
auto temp = head;
head = head->next;
delete temp;
}
return *this;
}
};
int main() {
goldbox goldbox_1 {2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9};
goldbox goldbox_2;
for (const auto& elem : goldbox_1) {
std::cout << elem << ' ';
} std::cout << '\n';
std::transform(goldbox_1.begin(), goldbox_1.end(),
std::back_inserter(goldbox_2),
[](auto x){return 2 * x - 1; }
);
for (const auto& elem : goldbox_2) {
std::cout << elem << ' ';
} std::cout << '\n';
return 0;
}
Output:
2 3 5 6 7 9
3 5 9 11 13 17
But I wanted to use it using ranges so that I don't have to create a new instance.
Once I applied the goldbox
inside the range-based for loop:
for (const auto& elem: goldbox_1 | std::ranges::views::transform([](auto x){return 2 * x - 1;})) {
std::cout << elem << ' ';
} std::cout << '\n';
It throws an error because I haven't provided an operator|
.
If I used the non-pipe syntax:
for (const auto& elem: std::ranges::views::transform(goldbox_1, [](auto x){return x + 1;})) {
std::cout << elem << ' ';
} std::cout << '\n';
It will still throw an error that both begin
and end
were not declared in the scope.
Upvotes: 8
Views: 1383
Reputation: 75688
TLDR
Your class doesn't satisfy std::ranges::input_range
because your iterator doesn't satisfy std::ranges::input_iterator
. In your iterator class you need to:
difference_type
aliasoperator==
constvalue_type
aliasT& operator*() const
it will still throw an error that both begin and end were not declared in the scope.
I do not know what compiler you use that gives this misleading error message. If you compile with gcc you get a proper error diagnostic:
note: the required expression 'std::ranges::__cust::begin(__t)' is invalid
581 | ranges::begin(__t); | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~
cc1plus: note: set '-fconcepts-diagnostics-depth=' to at least 2 for more detail
Setting a higher -fconcepts-diagnostics-depth=
we can see the root causes:
note: no operand of the disjunction is satisfied
114 | requires is_array_v<remove_reference_t<_Tp>> || __member_begin<_Tp> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 115 | || __adl_begin<_Tp> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Your container is not an array and you are not using adl begin but member begin so we need to look into why your class doesn't satisfy __member_begin
:
note: 'std::__detail::__decay_copy(__t.begin())' does not satisfy return-type-requirement, because
939 | { __detail::__decay_copy(__t.begin()) } -> input_or_output_iterator; | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~
The problem is that your iterator class is not actually a proper iterator. Lets' see why:
note: the expression 'is_constructible_v<_Tp, _Args ...> [with _Tp = goldbox::iterator; _Args = {}]' evaluated to 'false'
139 | = destructible<_Tp> && is_constructible_v<_Tp, _Args...>; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The first fix is to make your iterator default constructible. Doing that then recompiling we see that your class further doesn't satisfy the concept of an iterator:
note: the required type 'std::iter_difference_t<_Iter>' is invalid, because
601 | typename iter_difference_t<_Iter>; | ~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
and
note: '++ __i' does not satisfy return-type-requirement, because
603 | { ++__i } -> same_as<_Iter&>; | ^~~~~
You need to add difference_type
public alias and make the pre increment and pre decrement operators return a reference to the iterator.
Fixing this then recompiling we see that your class further doesn't satisfy the concept of an iterator:
note: 'std::__detail::__decay_copy(__t.end())' does not satisfy return-type-requirement, because
136 | { __decay_copy(__t.end()) } | ~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~
error: deduced expression type does not satisfy placeholder constraints
136 | { __decay_copy(__t.end()) } | ~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 137 | -> sentinel_for<decltype(_Begin{}(std::forward<_Tp>(__t)))>; | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
note: the required expression '(__t == __u)' is invalid, because
282 | { __t == __u } -> __boolean_testable; | ~~~~^~~~~~
This means that the iterator returned by begin()
is not comparable with the iterator returned by end
. Looking down the diagnostic depth you can see that your operator==
is not considered because it is not const.
Fixing this then recompiling we see that your class further doesn't satisfy the concept of an input_iterator:
note: the required type 'std::iter_value_t<_In>' is invalid, because
514 | typename iter_value_t<_In>; | ~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This is fixed by adding a public value_type
alias.
Next:
note: nested requirement 'same_as<std::iter_reference_t, std::iter_reference_t<_Tp> >' is not satisfied, because
517 | requires same_as<iter_reference_t<const _In>, | ~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 518 | iter_reference_t<_In>>; | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This means that operator*
should return the same reference type for both iterator
and const iterator
. This is fixed by adding a const operator*
:
T& operator*();
T& operator*() const;
And now all the compile errors are fixed and both versions (pipe and non-pipe) compile. Please note I've fixed the compile errors, haven't checked your semantics.
Upvotes: 12