Reputation: 1747
List("Steve", "Tom", "John", "Bob").sortWith(_.compareTo(_) < 0) = List("Bob", "John", "Steve", "Tom")
the param of sortWith is:
lt: (A, A) => Boolean
where a function with two params and return a boolean
but compareTo have only one param:
def compareTo(that: A): Int
if compareTo is a function,it have two params.but it's scala,so compareTo is a method,it's have only one param
so why there can use compareTo in sortWith?It seems not accord with the type signature of sortWith
Upvotes: 0
Views: 131
Reputation: 48410
This usage of underscore is known as Placeholder Syntax for Anonymous Functions:
Such an expression represents an anonymous function where subsequent occurrences of underscores denote successive parameters.
Note each underscore refers to different parameter so for example
_ + _
expands to
(x1, x2) => x1 + x2
Also expression _ + _
makes use of point-free syntax as opposed to
_.+(_)
for example
List("Steve", "Tom", "John", "Bob").reduce((x1: String, x2: String) => x1.+(x2)) // : String = "SteveTomJohnBob"
List("Steve", "Tom", "John", "Bob").reduce((x1, x2) => x1.+(x2)) // : String = "SteveTomJohnBob"
List("Steve", "Tom", "John", "Bob").reduce(_.+(_)) // : String = "SteveTomJohnBob"
List("Steve", "Tom", "John", "Bob").reduce(_ + _) // : String = "SteveTomJohnBob"
so now it should be clearer why expression _.compareTo(_) < 0
works
List("Steve", "Tom", "John", "Bob").sortWith(_.compareTo(_) < 0) // : List[String] = List("Bob", "John", "Steve", "Tom")
List("Steve", "Tom", "John", "Bob").sortWith((x1, x2) => x1.compareTo(x2) < 0) // : List[String] = List("Bob", "John", "Steve", "Tom")
Another way to see this let's type-ascribe the sugared expression
scala> (_.compareTo(_) < 0): ((String, String) => Boolean)
val res0: (String, String) => Boolean = $Lambda$7865/418832725@18987bf5
Upvotes: 3