Reputation: 185
I would like to know if it is necessary for me to specify it like this:
<link rel="icon" href="[URL]" type="image/x-icon" />
<link rel="shortcut icon" href="[URL]" type="image/x-icon" />
or can I just include it in the root and the browser will look for it?
Also what's the difference between rel="icon"
and rel="shortcut"
?
Upvotes: 14
Views: 8081
Reputation: 1
I have observed this same thing in my firefox-nightly browser at call as simple as localhost:3000 with no internet connection. However, in Chrome it is not the case. Maybe it's because of some extension.
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 81384
All of the major five browsers look in the site's root for a file named exactly favicon.ico
, regardless of type, automatically.
You can override this with a link
element with rel="icon"
, or rel="shortcut icon"
. The latter is supported by every browser, while the former is more correct, but not recognised by Internet Explorer.
Upvotes: 28
Reputation: 499002
Most browsers these days will look for a favicon.ico
file on the root of the site.
Upvotes: 1