Reputation: 906
I'm trying to figure out what to call tags in CSS in order to build nice paragraphs.
For now, this is what my code looks like:
p {
font-size: 1em;
line-height: 1.25em;
margin: 0;
text-align: left;
}
p + p {
text-indent: 2.5em;
}
li p, blockquote p {
margin: .5em 0;
}
And my HTML:
<p><strong>A little title</strong></p>
<p>Content text which can be single line or big block aswell.</p>
Referring to the code above, I want to call the
<p><strong>g</strong></p>
content, so that it doesn't inherit from p
as previously entered.
I tried :
p strong
which do call every strong
located in a p
but only inside of it. I mean : only on strong
, after the p
container has been set. Could maybe work with negative margin but a bit messy ...
p:not(p strong)
which sounds like a solution, but doesn't fit that case since the strong
is still heriting from the p
styling.
Is there any way to do this with CSS?
--- EDIT ---
I used the p >strong:only-child
for now, which is calling the strong
tags located alone in p
tags. To give the good visual rendering, I applied a negative left margin of the indent size ... as a temporary solution.
Upvotes: 1
Views: 176
Reputation: 6598
You may want to try p:not()
. Further documentation is here: http://reference.sitepoint.com/css/pseudoclass-not
Update: Unfortunately the strong
part continues to inherit the p
tag styling. Your best bet would be to clear it in a selector such as p strong
and then apply the rest of the styles that you want there.
Update 2: Turns out you ARE able to use the :not
psuedo-selector. An example here: http://jsfiddle.net/Mf5uc/1/
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 27460
As far as I understand you want something like "contains":
p:contains(b) { line-height: 2em; }
but there is no such a selector in CSS in principle. If you want to know why then read my article "CSS, selectors and computational complexity"
Options for you:
a) Either to use classes like p.header
, p.normal
or
b) define style for the <b>
rather than for <p>
itself:
p > b:first-child:last-child {
font-size: 2em;
}
Let me know if you will need comments on p > b:first-child:last-child
selector.
Upvotes: 1