Reputation: 47
I have a dataset of 161 immune markers, each a vector in a data frame. Using R, I want to compare 78 pairs of these vectors using the Wilcoxon signed rank (paired) test. The immune markers are distinguished in their names by "_MOM" or "_CB."
Here's a "toy" dataset with example variable names:
# Create toy data frame
toydata = data.frame(CCBB_dyad_number=c(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10),
cCMV_status = c("cCMV+", "cCMV-", "cCMV-",
"cCMV+", "cCMV+", "cCMV-",
"cCMV-", "cCMV+", "cCMV+",
"cCMV+"),
maternal_CMV_IgM_status = c("negative", "negative", "positive",
"negative", "positive", "negative",
"positive", "positive", "positive",
"negative"),
TB40E_conc_CB = c(1.954727, NA, 1.992956,
1.831331, 1.905936, 2.053446,
2.055809, 1.739377, 2.052576,
1.961838),
AD169r_conc_CB = c(5.86714, 6.469020, 9.387268,
5.733174, 6.480673, 5.176167,
7.548077, 7.209173, 4.944089,
9.667219),
TB40E_conc_MOM = c(7.389400, 5.917861, 7.022016,
8.017846, 10.046830, 7.503896,
6.427719, 9.498801, 7.351678,
6.050478),
AD169r_conc_MOM = c(7.011906, 6.506734, 9.986478,
5.673412, 3.825439, 5.795331,
7.082124, 6.810222, 5.54213,
8.271366)
)
With some help, I have written code to loop through all 161 vectors and produce a new data frame with p-values and type of test using lapply
:
# Pull actual names of variables, not just numbers
excluded_vars <- toydata %>%
select(., c(CCBB_dyad_number,
cCMV_status,
maternal_CMV_IgM_status)) %>%
names(.)
var_list <- toydata %>%
select(., -any_of(excluded_vars)) %>%
names(.)
out = lapply(var_list, function(v){
#cat(paste0("Wilcox: ", v, "\n")) #Loop message for checking
fmla <- formula(paste(v, " ~ cCMV_status"))
wilcox.test(fmla, data = toydata, paired = FALSE) %>%
purrr::flatten() %>% #Unnest/convert to plain list
as.data.frame(stringsAsFactors=FALSE) %>% #Set as data frame
mutate(Variable = v) %>% #add new variable column (could also get it from data.name)
select(Variable, W.statistic=W, P.value=p.value, Method=method) %>%
mutate(P.value=scientific(P.value, digits=2, format="e"))
}) %>% #%T>% { names(out) <- var_list } %>% #Didn't actually need this, but could if wanted a named list
purrr::compact() %>% #Remove any empty data frames/list elements (NULL)
dplyr::bind_rows() #Bind list of data frames into single data frame
out$FDR_P.value <- p.adjust(out$P.value, method="fdr", n=length(out$P.value)) %>%
scientific(., digits = 2, format = "e")
col_order <- c("Variable", "W.statistic", "P.value", # Reorder columns for tabling
"FDR_P.value", "Method")
out <- out[, col_order]
kable(out, "html", booktabs = T) %>%
kable_styling(latex_options = c("striped", "scale_down")) # Print output as a nice table
However, I'm having trouble thinking through how to write code to loop the signed rank test through multiple different pairs of vectors. I'm thinking I would pull the vectors (or just vector names?), like so:
toy_cCMV_pos <- toydata %>%
filter(cCMV_status == 'cCMV+') %>%
select(., -any_of(excluded_vars))
variable.set1 <- toy_cCMV_pos %>%
select(., ends_with("_MOM"))
variable.set2 <- toy_cCMV_pos %>%
select(., ends_with("_CB"))
Someone suggested looping through the vectors like this. However, I keep getting an "undefined columns selected" error, and because I don't quite understand what the code below is doing, I can't troubleshoot.
for (a in variable.set1) {
groups = unique(toy_cCMV_pos[,a])
for (b in variable.set2) {
wilcox.test(x=toy_cCMV_pos[which(toy_cCMV_pos[a]==groups[1]),b],
y=toy_cCMV_pos[which(toy_cCMV_pos[a]==groups[2]),b],
paired=TRUE)
}
}
# Keep getting error "undefined columns selected"
I would like to be able to pull results, including p-values, into a new data frame as with the rank sum tests.
Could anyone help me think through how to do run these paired tests?
Upvotes: 1
Views: 2222
Reputation: 1528
EDIT: the original solution deleted missing values row-wise, so some valid data were delete too leading with results inconsistent with other methods.
Here is a more correct approach:
library(tidyr)
library(dplyr)
#>
#> Attaching package: 'dplyr'
#> The following objects are masked from 'package:stats':
#>
#> filter, lag
#> The following objects are masked from 'package:base':
#>
#> intersect, setdiff, setequal, union
toydata = data.frame(CCBB_dyad_number=c(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10),
cCMV_status = c("cCMV+", "cCMV-", "cCMV-",
"cCMV+", "cCMV+", "cCMV-",
"cCMV-", "cCMV+", "cCMV+",
"cCMV+"),
maternal_CMV_IgM_status = c("negative", "negative", "positive",
"negative", "positive", "negative",
"positive", "positive", "positive",
"negative"),
TB40E_conc_CB = c(1.954727, NA, 1.992956,
1.831331, 1.905936, 2.053446,
2.055809, 1.739377, 2.052576,
1.961838),
AD169r_conc_CB = c(5.86714, 6.469020, 9.387268,
5.733174, 6.480673, 5.176167,
7.548077, 7.209173, 4.944089,
9.667219),
TB40E_conc_MOM = c(7.389400, 5.917861, 7.022016,
8.017846, 10.046830, 7.503896,
6.427719, 9.498801, 7.351678,
6.050478),
AD169r_conc_MOM = c(7.011906, 6.506734, 9.986478,
5.673412, 3.825439, 5.795331,
7.082124, 6.810222, 5.54213,
8.271366))
toydata |>
select(ends_with("MOM"), ends_with("CB")) |>
pivot_longer(everything(),
names_to=c(".value", "group"),
names_sep="_(?!.*_)") |>
pivot_longer(-group,
names_to="variable",
values_to="value") |>
group_by(variable) |>
do(broom::tidy(wilcox.test(.$value ~ .$group, paired=TRUE, na.action=na.pass)))
#> # A tibble: 2 × 5
#> # Groups: variable [2]
#> variable statistic p.value method alternative
#> <chr> <dbl> <dbl> <chr> <chr>
#> 1 AD169r_conc 28 1 Wilcoxon signed rank exact test two.sided
#> 2 TB40E_conc 0 0.00391 Wilcoxon signed rank exact test two.sided
Created on 2021-09-09 by the reprex package (v2.0.1)
The results match those of the individual calculations:
> wilcox.test(toydata$TB40E_conc_CB, toydata$TB40E_conc_MOM, paired=TRUE)
Wilcoxon signed rank exact test
data: toydata$TB40E_conc_CB and toydata$TB40E_conc_MOM
V = 0, p-value = 0.003906
alternative hypothesis: true location shift is not equal to 0
And
> wilcox.test(toydata$AD169r_conc_CB, toydata$AD169r_conc_MOM, paired=TRUE)
Wilcoxon signed rank exact test
data: toydata$AD169r_conc_CB and toydata$AD169r_conc_MOM
V = 28, p-value = 1
alternative hypothesis: true location shift is not equal to 0
The result of the proposed solution is a tibble/dataframe, so you can modify it selecting only the needed columns.
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 3901
Not sure if this is what you are looking for, but here I perform the Wilcoxon test between CB
and MOM
for each of prefix groups.
library(tidyverse)
library(broom)
toydata = data.frame(CCBB_dyad_number=c(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10), cCMV_status = c("cCMV+", "cCMV-", "cCMV-", "cCMV+", "cCMV+", "cCMV-", "cCMV-", "cCMV+", "cCMV+", "cCMV+"), maternal_CMV_IgM_status = c("negative", "negative", "positive", "negative", "positive", "negative", "positive", "positive", "positive", "negative"), TB40E_conc_CB = c(1.954727, NA, 1.992956, 1.831331, 1.905936, 2.053446, 2.055809, 1.739377, 2.052576, 1.961838), AD169r_conc_CB = c(5.86714, 6.469020, 9.387268, 5.733174, 6.480673, 5.176167, 7.548077, 7.209173, 4.944089, 9.667219), TB40E_conc_MOM = c(7.389400, 5.917861, 7.022016, 8.017846, 10.046830, 7.503896, 6.427719, 9.498801, 7.351678, 6.050478), AD169r_conc_MOM = c(7.011906, 6.506734, 9.986478, 5.673412, 3.825439, 5.795331, 7.082124, 6.810222, 5.54213, 8.271366))
toydata %>%
as_tibble() %>%
gather("var", "val", -1:-3) %>%
separate(var, c("marker", "conc", "type")) %>%
spread(type, val) %>%
group_by(marker) %>%
summarize(wilcox = tidy(wilcox.test(MOM, CB)))
#> # A tibble: 2 × 2
#> marker wilcox$statistic $p.value $method $alternative
#> <chr> <dbl> <dbl> <chr> <chr>
#> 1 AD169r 49 0.971 Wilcoxon rank sum exact test two.sided
#> 2 TB40E 90 0.0000217 Wilcoxon rank sum exact test two.sided
Upvotes: 1