Reputation: 391
Suppose that I have a pandas dataframe like the one below:
import pandas as pd
df = pd.DataFrame({'fk ID': [1,1,2,2],
'value': [3,3,4,5],
'valID': [1,2,1,2]})
The above would give me the following output:
print(df)
fk ID value valID
0 1 3 1
1 1 3 2
2 2 4 1
3 2 5 2
or
|fk ID| value | valId |
| 1 | 3 | 1 |
| 1 | 3 | 2 |
| 2 | 4 | 1 |
| 2 | 5 | 2 |
and I would like to transpose and pivot it in such a way that I get the following table and the same order of column names:
fk ID value valID fkID value valID
| 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 |
| 2 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 2 |
Upvotes: 3
Views: 497
Reputation: 127
If your group sizes are guaranteed to be the same, you could merge your odd and even rows:
import pandas as pd
df = pd.DataFrame({'fk ID': [1,1,2,2],
'value': [3,3,4,5],
'valID': [1,2,1,2]})
df_even = df[df.index%2==0].reset_index(drop=True)
df_odd = df[df.index%2==1].reset_index(drop=True)
df_odd.join(df_even, rsuffix='_2')
Yields
fk ID value valID fk ID_2 value_2 valID_2
0 1 3 2 1 3 1
1 2 5 2 2 4 1
I'd expect this to be pretty performant, and this could be generalized for any number of rows in each group (vs assuming odd/even for two rows per group), but will require that you have the same number of rows per fk ID.
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 639
You can cast df as a numpy array, reshape it and cast it back to a dataframe, then rename the columns (0..5). This is working too if values are not numbers but strings.
import pandas as pd
df = pd.DataFrame({'fk ID': [1,1,2,2],
'value': [3,3,4,5],
'valID': [1,2,1,2]})
nrows = 2
array = df.to_numpy().reshape((nrows, -1))
pd.DataFrame(array).rename(mapper=lambda x: df.columns[x % len(df.columns)], axis=1)
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 5433
The most straightforward solution I can think of is
df = pd.DataFrame({'fk ID': [1,1,2,2],
'value': [3,3,4,5],
'valID': [1,2,1,2]})
# concatenate the rows (Series) of each 'fk ID' group side by side
def flatten_group(g):
return pd.concat(row for _, row in g.iterrows())
res = df.groupby('fk ID', as_index=False).apply(flatten_group)
However, using Series.iterrows
is not ideal, and can be very slow if the size of each group is large.
Furthermore, the above solution doesn't work if the 'fk ID' groups have different sizes. To see that, we can add a third group to the DataFrame
>>> df2 = df.append({'fk ID': 3, 'value':10, 'valID': 4},
ignore_index=True)
>>> df2
fk ID value valID
0 1 3 1
1 1 3 2
2 2 4 1
3 2 5 2
4 3 10 4
>>> df2.groupby('fk ID', as_index=False).apply(flatten_group)
0 fk ID 1
value 3
valID 1
fk ID 1
value 3
valID 2
1 fk ID 2
value 4
valID 1
fk ID 2
value 5
valID 2
2 fk ID 3
value 10
valID 4
dtype: int64
The result is not a DataFrame as one could expect, because pandas
can't align the columns of the groups.
To solve this I suggest the following solution. It should work for any group size, and should be faster for large DataFrames.
import numpy as np
def flatten_group(g):
# flatten each group data into a single row
flat_data = g.to_numpy().reshape(1,-1)
return pd.DataFrame(flat_data)
# group the rows by 'fk ID'
groups = df.groupby('fk ID', group_keys=False)
# get the maximum group size
max_group_size = groups.size().max()
# contruct the new columns by repeating the
# original columns 'max_group_size' times
new_cols = np.tile(df.columns, max_group_size)
# aggregate the flattened rows
res = groups.apply(flatten_group).reset_index(drop=True)
# update the columns
res.columns = new_cols
Output:
# df
>>> res
fk ID value valID fk ID value valID
0 1 3 1 1 3 2
1 2 4 1 2 5 2
# df2
>>> res
fk ID value valID fk ID value valID
0 1 3 1 1.0 3.0 2.0
1 2 4 1 2.0 5.0 2.0
2 3 10 4 NaN NaN NaN
Upvotes: 1