Reputation: 2524
I'm calling different APIs, that use the same key name in the JSON file. Depending on the response, there's one field that may be different types.
To be clear:
The key "results" when calling the API nº1 is a JSON object
The key "results" when calling the API nº2 is a JSON array
My code looks like this when using the second API:
data class Result(
@SerializedName("results") var persons:ArrayList<Person> =ArrayList()
)
The question is if there's any way to use the same class, without taking care if it's a JSON array or a JSON object.
Upvotes: 0
Views: 414
Reputation: 12932
You can use ObjectMapper.typeFactory.constructParametricType
to handle generic types:
data class Result<T>(
var x:T
)
val om = ObjectMapper()
om.registerModule(KotlinModule())
val parsedList = om.readValue<Result<List<String>>>(
"""{"x":["x1", "x2"]}""",
om.typeFactory.constructParametricType(Result::class.java, List::class.java)
)
println(parsedList)
val parsedMap = om.readValue<Result<Map<String, String>>>(
"""{"x":{"k1": "v1", "k2": "v2"}}""",
om.typeFactory.constructParametricType(Result::class.java, Map::class.java)
)
println(parsedMap)
Gives output:
Result(x=[x1, x2])
Result(x={k1=v1, k2=v2})
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 41
I believe you can define results as an instance of com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.
JsonNode
.
data class Result(
val results: JsonNode
)
Then you can process results
based on it's type—whether it is an ArrayNode
or an ObjectNode
(as both extend JsonNode
):
fun processResults(results: JsonNode) = when{
results.isArray -> processArrayNode(results)
else -> processObjectNode(results)
}
private fun processArrayNode(list: JsonNode): *return whatever you need*{
val elements = list
.elements()
.asSequence()
.toList()
val mappedElements = elements.map{
processObjectNode(it)
}
// do whatever you need with the array
}
private fun processObjectNode(person: JsonNode): *return whatever you need*{
//** this will transform the json node into a linkedHashMap where the keys are the json keys and the values are the values (here interpreted as jsonNodes) **/
val fieldsMap = person
.fields()
.asSequence()
.associateBy( {it.key}, {it.value} )
// process whatever you need
}
This is one way to use the same DTO for both API calls. In my opinion, it is not worth the extra work. I would create two DTOs containing the results
field, where in one it is an instance of Person
, and in the other it is an instance of List<Person>
.
Edit: One little upgrade to the above snippet would be to add extension methods to JsonNode
:
fun JsonNode.elementsToList(): List<JsonNode> = this
.elements()
.asSequence()
.toList()
fun JsonNode.fieldsToMap(): Map<String, JsonNode> = this
.fields()
.asSequence()
.associateBy({it.key}, {it.value})
Upvotes: 4