Reputation: 67
I have this code that remove Items in class btn-danger. I just want to know what can I use instead of for loop to make the code cleaner:
var removeCartItemButtons = document.getElementsByClassName('btn-danger');
for (var i = 0; i < removeCartItemButtons.length; i++) {
var button = removeCartItemButtons[i];
button.addEventListener('click', function (e) {
var buttonClicked = e.target;
buttonClicked.parentElement.parentElement.remove();
});
}
Upvotes: 0
Views: 81
Reputation: 91
General Improvement
let
instead of var
. See Thisconst
instead of let
.document.querySelectorAll()
or document.querySelector()
are in some cases (like in your case) better than getElementsByClassName
or getElementById
or getElementsByTagName
.forEach
is generally a better (more readable) option than a for
loop. (querySelectorAll
returns a static node list. You don't need Array.from
, but if you want to use other Array specific methods use Array.from
as @Yousaf pointed out)function
in the global scope and for Object.prototype
properties. Use class
for object constructors. Use =>
everywhere else. See This.Here is how I would have written it
document.querySelectorAll('.btn-danger').forEach(btn=>btn.addEventListener('click',e=>e.target.parentElement.parentElement.remove()))
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 43983
Your code can be shortened to:
Array.from(document.getElementsByClassName('btn-danger')).forEach((button) => {
button.addEventListener('click', (e) => {
e.target.parentElement.parentElement.remove();
});
});
This uses:
Array.from().forEach()
:
Since the array functions can be re-written without the {}
, an one-liner would look like:
Array.from(document.getElementsByClassName('btn-danger')).forEach((button) => button.addEventListener('click', (e) => e.target.parentElement.parentElement.remove()));
Upvotes: 0