Reputation: 14526
I have two questions:
First, is there any more direct, sane way to go from a texture atlas image to a texture array in WebGL than what I'm doing below? I've not tried this, but doing it entirely in WebGL seems possible, though four-times the work and I still have to make two round trips to the GPU to do it.
And am I right that because buffer data for texImage3D()
must come from PIXEL_UNPACK_BUFFER
, this data must come directly from the CPU side? I.e. There is no way to copy from one block of GPU memory to a PIXEL_UNPACK_BUFFER
without copying it to the CPU first. I'm pretty sure the answer to this is a hard "no".
In case my questions themselves are stupid (and they may be), my ultimate goal here is simply to convert a texture atlas PNG to a texture array. From what I've tried, the fastest way to do this by far is via PIXEL_UNPACK_BUFFER
, rather than extracting each sub-image and sending them in one at a time, which for large atlases is extremely slow.
This is basically how I'm currently getting my pixel data.
const imageToBinary = async (image: HTMLImageElement) => {
const canvas = document.createElement('canvas');
canvas.width = image.width;
canvas.height = image.height;
const context = canvas.getContext('2d');
context.drawImage(image, 0, 0);
const imageData = context.getImageData(0, 0, image.width, image.height);
return imageData.data;
};
So, I'm creating an HTMLImageElement object, which contains the uncompressed pixel data I want, but has no methods to get at it directly. Then I'm creating a 2D context version containing the same pixel data a second time. Then I'm repopulating the GPU with the same pixel data a third time. Seems bonkers to me, but I don't see a way around it.
Upvotes: 0
Views: 257