Reputation: 16928
Why do these queries give different results? Reference is a single character column and I would expect to have a result giving counts for upper and lower case letter 'r'.
Select SUM(IIF(StrComp([REFERENCE],'R',0) = 0, 1, 0)) AS BIG_R,
SUM(IIF(StrComp([REFERENCE],'r',0) = 0, 1, 0)) AS LITTLE_R
From [SYMREF]
Where [PROGRAM] = 'SOMEPROGRAM'
The result is that both BIG_R and LITTLE_R are the same and equal the count of BIG_R's
However,
Select SUM(IIF(StrComp([REFERENCE],'r',0) = 0, 1, 0)) AS LITTE_R,
SUM(IIF(StrComp([REFERENCE],'R',0) = 0, 1, 0)) AS BIG_R
From [SYMREF]
Where [PROGRAM] = 'SOMEPROGRAM'
Again LITTLE_R and BIG_R are the same, but this time they equal the count of LITTLE_R's
This looks like a bug in the way MS Access processes this type of query, or have I missed something here?
Upvotes: 1
Views: 66
Reputation: 112392
Access (or probably rather JetEngine) thinks that StrComp
is called twice with the same argument and optimizes away one of the two calls.
A workaround is to compare the ASCII character values (Asc("r") = 114
, Asc("R") = 82
):
Select
SUM(IIF(Asc([REFERENCE]) = Asc('R'), 1, 0)) AS BIG_R,
SUM(IIF(Asc([REFERENCE]) = Asc('r'), 1, 0)) AS LITTLE_R
From [SYMREF]
Where [PROGRAM] = 'SOMEPROGRAM'
Yet another workaround:
Select SUM(IIF(StrComp([REFERENCE],Chr$(82),0) = 0, 1, 0)) AS BIG_R,
SUM(IIF(StrComp([REFERENCE],Chr$(114),0) = 0, 1, 0)) AS LITTLE_R
From [SYMREF]
Where [PROGRAM] = 'SOMEPROGRAM'
Here the two inputs to StrComp
are clearly different. So, the second call not optimized away.
Upvotes: 2