Reputation: 111
There are two standard methods of passing arguments -- by value, and constant reference. Each has its trade-offs, with value being preferable in most cases that the data is very small. However, I just recently looked into templates more, and the way I understand it, they act more like a macro. Could you use templates to favor efficiency (disregarding bad code cleanliness for now)? For example, if I passed a std::vector through a template, would it allow access to the current scope to the function called?
Upvotes: 1
Views: 142
Reputation: 9525
I think you are misunderstanding what templates are.
Template arguments are not another way of passing runtime arguments to a function. Templates are a way essentially of doing code generation if you want to use the exact same code multiple times but with different types and/or constants when you know all the types and constant values at compile time.
So to answer your question
For example, if I passed a std::vector through a template, would it allow access to the current scope to the function called?
you can't pass an std::vector value to a template function beyond normal argument passing which may be parametrized on the type. As for allowing access to a vector in the current scope, you don't need templates for that anyway: pass a reference to the vector.
Upvotes: 2