CODEWITHSUNDEEP
runit-testingautomated-testsdevtoolsr-package
Martin Smith
Martin Smith

Reputation: 4077

Using testthat with more than one expected outcome

I wish to check an R function that may output one of two acceptable values using the "testthat" package. Here's a simplified example:

Foo <- function () {
  if (uncontrolable_condition) {
    matrix(as.raw(0x0c))
  } else {
    matrix(as.raw(0x03))
  }
}

The best solution I could come up with is

result <- Foo()
expect_true(identical(result, matrix(as.raw(0x0c))) ||
            identical(result, matrix(as.raw(0x03))))

But this loses the functionality of waldo::compare: if I fail the test, I have to manually run waldo::compare(Foo(), matrix(as.raw(0x0c))) to see how the output differs from the expectation.

Upvotes: 0

Views: 243

Answers (1)

Marcus
Marcus

Reputation: 3636

I think you're going to need a custom expectation. Based on the testthat pkgdown site, it might look something like this:

expect_options <- function(object, options) {
  
  # 1. Capture object and label
  act <- quasi_label(rlang::enquo(object), arg = "object")
  
  # 2. Call expect()
  compResults <- purrr::map_lgl(options, ~identical(act$val, .x))
  expect(
    any(compResults),
    sprintf(
      "Input (%s) is not one of the accepted options: %s",
            toString(act$val),
            paste(purrr::map_chr(options, toString), collapse = ", ")
    )
  )
  
  # 3. Invisibly return the value
  invisible(act$val)

}

expect_options(result, list(matrix(as.raw(0x0c)), matrix(as.raw(0x03))))

Upvotes: 1

Related Questions