Reputation: 4381
Clearly the com.sun.xml.bind:jaxb-impl artifact is labelled "Old JAXB Runtime module" in the maven repository (see link below), and yet both of these artifacts are still getting new releases:
https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.glassfish.jaxb/jaxb-runtime https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.sun.xml.bind/jaxb-impl
This answer Which artifacts should I use for JAXB RI in my Maven project? does not clarify the difference.
The accepted answer to both the above question and this one How to resolve java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: javax/xml/bind/JAXBException conclude that for Java 9+ you should use: org.glassfish.jaxb:jaxb-runtime
But I have code using com.sun.xml.bind:jaxb-impl and it appears to be working fine. So what do I lose or gain by moving to jaxb-runtime?
Even the latest (3.0.2 at the time I write this) version is available for the "OLD" jaxb-impl module. If Oracle isn't doing this anymore, who makes the com.sun.xml.bind:jaxb-impl artifact? What is it for? Why doesn't it share the Maven group coordinates with jaxb-runtime?
Is there any central location that clearly documents what the current state of affairs is with JAXB?
There is just so much confusion with JAXB now.
P.S. I need to remain compatible with Java 8 for the time being - so I can't go to 3.x yet, and 2.4.x appears to be an abandoned attempt at fixing the modularity that they foolishly broke when it was split out of the JDK.
Upvotes: 41
Views: 37344
Reputation: 2199
The only difference between jaxb-impl
and jaxb-runtime
is packaging: jaxb-impl
bundles istack/txw2 inside the jar, whereas jaxb-runtime
provides them via separate dependencies.
I've been trying to make sense of this for the last day, and it's incredibly confusing. Particularly when you're trying to avoid the java.xml.bind
to jakarta.xml.bind
migration. There's out of date information everywhere and some broken releases in the jaxb-impl
2.3.x release line.
Best I can tell, GlassFish was providing the JAXB reference implementation. It's since moved to EE4J, but releases continue from that project against both sets of coordinates. Appears that com.sun.xml.bind:jaxb-ri
is where the latest full bundles are released:
https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jaxb-ri/
Having figured out that piece of history, the real mess is that none of the artifacts reflect the javax.xml.bind
to jakarta.xml.bind
move in their artifact coordinates, only in the versions. This means if you're in ecosystem where you need both to exist, you're going to have a bad time.
For instance, the 2.3.3 release changed from depending on javax.xml.bind:jaxb-api
to jakarta.xml.bind:jakarta.xml.bind-api
because at 2.x, the jakarta
artifacts provide the javax.xml.bind
packages. At version 3.0.0 it provides jakarta.xml.bind
.
The implementations are the same at 3.0.0 which means while the earlier versions could happily exist at runtime, you have no way of resolving them both in build tools and conflict resolution is going to break legacy uses of javax.xml.bind
APIs.
For projects that need both APIs to coexist without migrating the legacy code:
javax.xml.bind
use com.sun.xml.bind:jaxb-impl:2.3.6
. Ignore the 3.0.0 and later releases. Add an explicit dependency on javax.xml.bind:jaxb-api:2.3.1
so that you have a package providing the javax.xml.bind
APIjakarta.xml.bind
use the latest org.glassfish.jaxb:jaxb-runtime
. Ignore the releases earlier than 3.0.0Use the tomcat-jakartaee-migration tool to rewrite classes for deployment.
For Gradle projects, you can use the gradle-jakartaee-migration-plugin, and get the benefit of capabilities and transforms at development time too.
You can use either of the coordinates for the runtime based on your preferences for packaging:
com.sun.xml.bind:jaxb-impl:4.0.0
org.glassfish.jaxb:jaxb-runtime:4.0.0
Both depend on jakarta.xml.bind:jakarta.xml.bind-api
with the jakarta.xml.bind
package namespace.
Upvotes: 59