Reputation: 1935
I have 2 web applications.
I want it to access to the same shared database with Hibernate and i want to use a second level cache in each. But i want the second web application to be able to see the first web application's modifications.
I am not sure to have understood but is Hazelcast a solution for my need ?
Will i be able to manage transactions as before with Spring with that solution?
Thank you.
Upvotes: 0
Views: 273
Reputation: 20594
So i cannot use two separated Hibernate Session Factories.
Why not? Except you have set the flush mode to MANUAL
, there should be no problem. Typical setting is COMMIT
or AUTO
.
Any further problems can occur using a second level cache. Avoid this if your app server has no JTA environment.
PS: The hibernate settings can be configured by spring, but it can be done any other way.
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 562
I think you are making this more complicated than it needs to be. Just set up both web apps to pull in data using a select statement, and whenever you modify data (using an update) on one of the page, do a post back.
This way no matter which page makes a change, the page posts back and when the other page loads the change is already there. This should also work if you are using ajax to avoid post backs.
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 691715
Why do you think you can't have two separate session factories? This won't cause any problem, except if you're using a non-clustered second-level cache to store read-write entities.
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 27474
Just Do It. Any change that an application makes to a database should be visible to any other application that reads that database. Once a change is committed, it should be on the hard drive, and anybody else who reads the database from the hard drive should see it.
Upvotes: 0