Reputation:
I have the following code, but I get an error on on the last line:
struct coord {
int x, y;
bool operator=(const coord &o) {
return x == o.x && y == o.y;
}
bool operator<(const coord &o) {
return x < o.x || (x == o.x && y < o.y);
}
};
map<coord, int> m;
pair<coord, int> p((coord{0,0}),123);
m.insert(p); // ERROR here
How can I use a struct as key in a map?
I tried to change the code to this:
struct coord {
int x, y;
bool const operator==(const coord &o) {
return x == o.x && y == o.y;
}
bool const operator<(const coord &o) {
return x < o.x || (x == o.x && y < o.y);
}
};
But I'm still getting the following error:
C:\Users\tomc\Desktop\g>mingw32-make g++ test.cpp -std=c++0x In file included from c:\mingw\bin\../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.5.2/include/c++/string:5 0:0,
from c:\mingw\bin\../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.5.2/include/c++/bits/loc ale_classes.h:42,
from c:\mingw\bin\../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.5.2/include/c++/bits/ios
_base.h:43,
from c:\mingw\bin\../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.5.2/include/c++/ios:43,
from c:\mingw\bin\../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.5.2/include/c++/ostream: 40,
from c:\mingw\bin\../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.5.2/include/c++/iostream :40,
from test.cpp:1: c:\mingw\bin\../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.5.2/include/c++/bits/stl_function.h: In member function 'bool std::less<_Tp>::operator()(const _Tp&, const
_Tp&) const [with _ Tp = coord]': c:\mingw\bin\../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.5.2/include/c++/bits/stl_tree.h:1184:4: inst antiated from 'std::pair<std::_Rb_tree_iterator<_Val>, bool> std::_Rb_tree<_Key, _Val, _KeyOfValue, _Compare,
_Alloc>::_M_insert_unique(const _Val&) [with _Key
= coord, _Val = std::pair<const coord, int>, _KeyOfValue = std::_Select1st<std:: pair<const coord, int> >, _Compare = std::less<coord>, _Alloc = std::allocator<std::pair<const coord, int>>]' c:\mingw\bin\../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.5.2/include/c++/bits/stl_map.h:501:41: insta ntiated from 'std::pair<typename std::_Rb_tree<_Key, std::pair<const _Key, _Tp>, std::_Select1st<std::pair<const _Key,
_Tp> >, _Compare, typename _Alloc::rebind <std::map<_Key, _Tp,
_Compare, _Alloc>::value_type>::other>::iterator, bool> std ::map<_Key, _Tp, _Compare, _Alloc>::insert(const std::map<_Key, _Tp,
_Compare, _ Alloc>::value_type&) [with _Key = coord, _Tp = int,
_Compare = std::less<coord>, _Alloc = std::allocator<std::pair<const coord, int> >, typename std::_Rb_tree<_ Key, std::pair<const _Key,
_Tp>, std::_Select1st<std::pair<const _Key, _Tp> >, _ Compare, typename _Alloc::rebind<std::map<_Key, _Tp, _Compare,
_Alloc>::value_ty pe>::other>::iterator = std::_Rb_tree_iterator<std::pair<const coord, int> >, st d::map<_Key,
_Tp, _Compare, _Alloc>::value_type = std::pair<const coord, int>]' test.cpp:56:12: instantiated from here c:\mingw\bin\../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.5.2/include/c++/bits/stl_function.h:230:22: er ror: passing 'const coord' as 'this' argument of 'const bool coord::operator<(co nst coord&)' discards qualifiers mingw32-make: *** [game] Error 1
Upvotes: 45
Views: 74349
Reputation: 9743
As mentioned in the answer by Andrii, you can provide a custom comparison object to the map
instead of defining operator<
for your struct. Since C++11, you can also use a lambda expression instead of defining a comparison object. Moreover, you don't need to define operator==
for your struct to make the map
work. As a result, you can keep your struct as short as this:
struct coord {
int x, y;
};
And the rest of your code could be written as follows:
auto comp = [](const coord& c1, const coord& c2){
return c1.x < c2.x || (c1.x == c2.x && c1.y < c2.y);
};
std::map<coord, int, decltype(comp)> m(comp);
Upvotes: 12
Reputation: 4449
By far the simplest is to define a global "less than" operator for your struct in stead of as a member function.
std::map uses - by default - the 'lessthan' functor which, in turn, uses the global "operator<" defined for the key type of the map.
bool operator<(const coord& l, const coord& r) {
return (l.x<r.x || (l.x==r.x && l.y<r.y));
}
Upvotes: 13
Reputation: 1906
Another solution, which may be used for third-party data types, is to pass a Comparison object
as third template parameter.
example
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 52519
Try and make operator <
const
:
bool operator<(const coord &o) const {
(Your = operator
should probably be == operator
and const
as well)
Upvotes: 64