Reputation: 11
Hi I have a lmer model in which I am trying to see how much do categorical variables mouse_hit_target (Hit/miss) and click_number (first/second) predict QE_duration.
duration <- lmer(QE_duration ~ mouse_hit_target + click_number + (1|pid), data=lmm.data_2)
emmeans(duration, list(pairwise ~ click_number : mouse_hit_target), adjust = "tukey" )
When trying to compare the means between the different condition using emmeans the results are the same for the pairwise differences between "First Hit - Second Hit" and "First Miss - Second Miss"
emmeans of click_number, mouse_hit_target`
click_number mouse_hit_target emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL
First Hit 534.5567 10.56109 22.74 512.6957 556.4177
Second Hit 583.7066 10.67502 23.74 561.6617 605.7516
First Miss 514.6081 13.05561 52.81 488.4196 540.7965
Second Miss 563.7580 12.97912 51.56 537.7082 589.8078
Degrees-of-freedom method: kenward-roger
Confidence level used: 0.95
$`pairwise differences of click_number, mouse_hit_target`
1 estimate SE df t.ratio p.value
First Hit - Second Hit -49.14995 5.367714 2343.50 -9.157 <.0001
First Hit - First Miss 19.94864 8.555976 2350.95 2.332 0.0912
First Hit - Second Miss -29.20131 9.879585 2350.36 -2.956 0.0166
Second Hit - First Miss 69.09858 10.316392 2347.74 6.698 <.0001
Second Hit - Second Miss 19.94864 8.555976 2350.95 2.332 0.0912
First Miss - Second Miss -49.14995 5.367714 2343.50 -9.157 <.0001
Do you know what might be causing this?
Upvotes: 1
Views: 346
Reputation: 6760
That's because you fitted an additive model (no interaction), which posits exactly what you observe -- that the effects of one factor are the same, regardless of the other factor. If you don't think that's true, then you should fit the model
lmer(QE_duration ~ mouse_hit_target * click_number + (1|pid), data=lmm.data_2)
Upvotes: 1