CODEWITHSUNDEEP
c#vb6interop
Steve
Steve

Reputation: 12034

Making a C# kill event for a vb6 app?

I have a VB6 app that processes for a very, very long time. Killing it directly is not feasible, so I would like to set some sort of flag in the VB6 app. If in my C# app I decide to shut it down, I would like to toggle this flag to let the VB6 app know that a shutdown has been requested. Now, I also need something that is named because there will be several of the VB6 apps spun up as activex exes. Does anyone have any idea how to implement something like this? The workflow follows below

C# app - Spin up mulitple VB6 activex.exes in separate threads, Initialize the app with something (henceforth called a flag) I can change in C#, and call the DoStuff command, which takes a very long time to return.

VB6 - Gets the initialize command with the flag. DoStuff gets called. In the DoStuff loop, it checks if the flag is still set.

C# - Kill the project by setting the flag to another state

Any ideas?

Upvotes: 0

Views: 2635

Answers (3)

MarkJ
MarkJ

Reputation: 30408

Here is a pretty standard scheme for asynchronous background processing with VB6 clients and VB6 servers. (For instance it's in Dan Appleman's book and Microsoft's VB6 samples.) I think it should work for a C# client too.

  • The VB6 ActiveX EXE object should expose an event CheckQuitDoStuff(). This takes a ByRef Boolean called Quit.
  • The client calls StartDoStuff in the ActiveX EXE object. This routine starts a Timer on a hidden form and immediately returns. This unblocks the calling thread. The Timer interval is very short so the Timer event fires quickly.
  • The Timer event handler disables the Timer, and then calls back into the ActiveX object DoStuff method. This begins the lengthy processing.
  • Periodically the DoStuff method raises the CheckQuitDoStuff event. The client's event handler checks the special flag and sets Quit True if it's necessary to abort. Then DoStuff aborts the calculation and returns early if Quit is True.

This scheme means that the client doesn't actually need to be multi-threaded, since the calling thread doesn't block while "DoStuff" is happening. The tricky part is making sure that DoStuff raises the events at appropriate intervals - too long, and you can't quit when you want to: too short, and you are slowing down DoStuff unecessarily. Also, when DoStuff exits, it must unload the hidden form.

If DoStuff does actually manage to get all the stuff done before being aborted, you can raise a different event to tell the client that the job is finished.

Upvotes: 8

miPwn
miPwn

Reputation: 1166

I wouldn't keep a reference open across process boundaries but you can certianly cache the Long hWnd of the process and call kill on it from within .Net.

Upvotes: 0

RS Conley
RS Conley

Reputation: 7196

When you create the ActiveX Object keep a reference stored in the application or the thread. COM will handle the marshaling across threads. With a reference in hand you can call a method on it and kill it. If you keep the reference in the thread then you will need to use the interprocess messaging mechanism of .NET to pass to the .NET thread that you want to set the kill flag on the ActiveX EXE.

Upvotes: 1

Related Questions