Reputation: 21620
While editing, building up, or cherry picking from SQL statements I can find myself interacting with one of four popular database tools.
I have been resorting to single line commenting for DB2 and Informix. I have created macros in Vim to make this slightly more efficient, but I was wondering if I am working too hard.
Upvotes: 38
Views: 20861
Reputation: 753970
C style comments are standard in SQL 2003 and SQL 2008 (but not in SQL 1999 or before). The following DBMS all support C style comments:
That is not every possible DBMS, but it is more or less every major SQL DBMS. (I'll willingly add notes about any other DBMS that does - or does not - support C style comments.)
The SQL 2003 standard documents comment notations thus:
<comment> ::= <simple comment> | <bracketed comment>
<simple comment> ::=
<simple comment introducer> [ <comment character> ... ] <newline>
<simple comment introducer> ::=
<minus sign> <minus sign> [ <minus sign> ... ]
<bracketed comment> ::=
<bracketed comment introducer> <bracketed comment contents>
<bracketed comment terminator>
<bracketed comment introducer> ::= <slash> <asterisk>
<bracketed comment terminator> ::= <asterisk> <slash>
<bracketed comment contents> ::= [ { <comment character> | <separator> }... ]
<comment character> ::= <nonquote character> | <quote>
IBM Informix Dynamic Server (IDS or Informix) supports C style comments. It also supports '{ ... }
' as potentially multi-line comments, except in contexts where it means something else - that something else being a LIST or SET or MULTISET literal. (You might find that DB-Access gets confused by C style comments; that is a separate issue.)
Upvotes: 45
Reputation: 103345
The ISO standard only defines single-line comments beginning with two dashes. Some vendors support C-style commenting (i.e. multiline beginning with /* and ending with */), but it should not be considered "vendor agnostic".
Upvotes: 9