CODEWITHSUNDEEP
clinuxsetitimer
Ng Keng Leng
Ng Keng Leng

Reputation: 51

setitimer question

I have the following code running on my dual core machine.

When i'm running one or two instances of the application on the same PC, I have the correct timing resolution of 100msec. However, when i ran 3 instances of the same application on the same PC, the timing resolution is more than 100msec. Is it possible at all to make the 3 instances of application to run with the same resolution of 100msec? Is this related to the number of cores on my machine?

#include <signal.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <sys/time.h>

void timer_handler ( int signum)
{
   double time ; 
   // obtain time here
   gettimeofday() ;
   printf("timer_handler at time = %lf \n",
     time ) ;
}

int main ()
{ 
   struct sigaction sa;
   struct itimerval timer ;

   memset ( &sa, 0, sizeof ( sa ) ) ;

   sa.sa_handler = &timer_handler ;
   sigaction ( SIGALRM, &sa, NULL );

   timer.it_value.tv_sec = 0 ;
   timer.it_value.tv_usec = 100000;
   timer.it_interval.tv_sec = 0;
   timer.it_interval.tv_usec = 100000 ;

   setitimer ( ITIMER_REAL, &timer, NULL ) ;

   for (;;); 
}

Upvotes: 5

Views: 7972

Answers (1)

snap
snap

Reputation: 2792

The manual page setitimer(2) has the following:

Timers will never expire before the requested time, but may expire some (short) time afterwards, which depends on the system timer resolution and on the system load; see time(7).

Obviously when you are running more instances of your application the system load will get higher and the timers less accurate.

If you replace the busy loop:

for (;;);

with something less CPU bound (like an IO bound workload) the timing will become more accurate.

Upvotes: 3

Related Questions