Reputation: 181
I am playing around with circom and circomlib.
I am using a simple mimcsponge hashing circuit and seeing if I can create a correct input through javascript frontend.
The circuit I am running
template sponge_test() {
signal input l;
signal input r;
signal input o;
// instantiate - 2 inputs 220 rounds of hashing and 1 output
component hasher = MiMCSponge(2, 220, 1);
// signals in hasher
hasher.ins[0] <== l;
hasher.ins[1] <== r;
// addition constant
hasher.k <== 0;
o === hasher.outs[0];
}
component main = sponge_test();
In my javascript front end I am importing circomlib
import { buildMimcSponge } from 'circomlibjs';
function toHexString(byteArray) {
return Array.from(byteArray, function(byte) {
return ('0' + (byte & 0xFF).toString(16)).slice(-2);
}).join('')
}
export async function getProof(message) {
var hasher = await buildMimcSponge();
var h = hasher.multiHash([BigInt("0x3"), BigInt("0x4")]);
// returns byte array
console.log(h);
// back to hexstring
console.log(toHexString(h));
}
I then create an input.json that looks like this:
{
"l": "0x3",
"r": "0x4",
"o": "0x690f48aba976f2786371b7fa3e941df623e96329e0570dc610f59b7fcfa94723"
}
Which includes the values I used for the input of the hashing and the output I got from printing the hex value, and then run the following script
# Compile the circuit
circom ${CIRCUIT}.circom --r1cs --wasm --sym --c
# Generate the witness.wtns
node ${CIRCUIT}_js/generate_witness.js ${CIRCUIT}_js/${CIRCUIT}.wasm input.json ${CIRCUIT}_js/witness.wtns
And I get the error that the assert (o===hasher.outs[0])
fails.
Now, I know that that mimcsponge circuit uses 220 rounds as well in the javascript implementation of circomlib by looking at the node lib, where else could I be reaching inconsistent results for the hashing?
Upvotes: 2
Views: 463
Reputation: 181
So I found that reading the has is done using the following. I believe it is because it is specific to the elliptic curves being used.
hasher.F.toString(h, 16);
This produces the expected result which gets accepted by the circuit.
If anyone has further insights, I would be happy to understand it further.
Upvotes: 2