Reputation: 42593
I need to emulate a do-while loop in a Python program. Unfortunately, the following straightforward code does not work:
list_of_ints = [ 1, 2, 3 ]
iterator = list_of_ints.__iter__()
element = None
while True:
if element:
print element
try:
element = iterator.next()
except StopIteration:
break
print "done"
Instead of "1,2,3,done", it prints the following output:
[stdout:]1
[stdout:]2
[stdout:]3
None['Traceback (most recent call last):
', ' File "test_python.py", line 8, in <module>
s = i.next()
', 'StopIteration
']
What can I do in order to catch the 'stop iteration' exception and break a while loop properly?
An example of why such a thing may be needed is shown below as pseudocode.
State machine:
s = ""
while True :
if state is STATE_CODE :
if "//" in s :
tokens.add( TOKEN_COMMENT, s.split( "//" )[1] )
state = STATE_COMMENT
else :
tokens.add( TOKEN_CODE, s )
if state is STATE_COMMENT :
if "//" in s :
tokens.append( TOKEN_COMMENT, s.split( "//" )[1] )
else
state = STATE_CODE
# Re-evaluate same line
continue
try :
s = i.next()
except StopIteration :
break
Upvotes: 1116
Views: 1801956
Reputation: 6257
Building on evan54's answer:
With defining a helper class
class FirstAccess:
def __init__(self):
self._accessed = False
def __bool__(self):
if self._accessed:
return False
self._accessed = True
return True
one can save the update of the flag in the loop body, because it gets updated by accessing it:
first_pass = FirstAccess()
while first_pass or condition:
do_stuff()
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 11996
You can clean things up a bit with the walrus operator in Python 3.8:
list_of_ints = [ 1, 2, None, 3 ]
iterator = iter(list_of_ints)
_sentinel = object()
while True:
if (i := next(iterator, _sentinel)) is _sentinel:
break
print(i)
This has no duplicated logic outside the while
. It also handles values in the list that evaluate to False
.
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 13662
While loop:
while condition:
print("hello")
Do while loop:
while True:
print("hello")
if not condition:
break
Also you can use any true boolean value as condition:
while 1:
print("hello")
if not condition:
break
Another variant:
check = 1
while check:
print("hello")
check = condition
Upvotes: 10
Reputation: 668
while True:
try:
# stuff
stuff_1()
if some_cond:
continue
if other_cond:
break
stuff_2()
finally:
# condition
if not condition:
break
condition
checked only after running stuff
stuff
is not a function callcondition
is not a function callstuff
can contain flow controlcondition
if stuff
called break
(can be done with another boolean)Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 952
I believe that this do-while simulation on python has a syntax format closest to the do-while structure format present in C and Java.
do = True
while do:
[...]
do = <condition>
Upvotes: 19
Reputation: 123521
You wondered:
What can I do in order to catch the 'stop iteration' exception and break a while loop properly?
You could do it as shown below and which also makes use of the assignment expressions feature (aka “the walrus operator”) that was introduced in Python 3.8:
list_of_ints = [1, 2, 3]
iterator = iter(list_of_ints)
try:
while (element := next(iterator)):
print(element)
except StopIteration:
print("done")
Another possibility (that would work from Python 2.6 to 3.x) would be to provide a default
argument to the built-in next()
function to avoid the StopIteration
exception:
SENTINEL = object() # Unique object.
list_of_ints = [1, 2, 3]
iterator = iter(list_of_ints)
while True:
element = next(iterator, SENTINEL)
if element is SENTINEL:
break
print(element)
print("done")
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 311
Python 3.8 has the answer.
It's called assignment expressions. from the documentation:
# Loop over fixed length blocks
while (block := f.read(256)) != '':
process(block)
Upvotes: 11
Reputation: 6687
The built-in iter function does specifically that:
for x in iter(YOUR_FN, TERM_VAL):
...
E.g. (tested in Py2 and 3):
class Easy:
X = 0
@classmethod
def com(cls):
cls.X += 1
return cls.X
for x in iter(Easy.com, 10):
print(">>>", x)
If you want to give a condition to terminate instead of a value, you always can set an equality, and require that equality to be True
.
Upvotes: -2
Reputation: 574
For me a typical while loop will be something like this:
xBool = True
# A counter to force a condition (eg. yCount = some integer value)
while xBool:
# set up the condition (eg. if yCount > 0):
(Do something)
yCount = yCount - 1
else:
# (condition is not met, set xBool False)
xBool = False
I could include a for..loop within the while loop as well, if situation so warrants, for looping through another set of condition.
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 21912
I am not sure what you are trying to do. You can implement a do-while loop like this:
while True:
stuff()
if fail_condition:
break
Or:
stuff()
while not fail_condition:
stuff()
What are you doing trying to use a do while loop to print the stuff in the list? Why not just use:
for i in l:
print i
print "done"
Update:
So do you have a list of lines? And you want to keep iterating through it? How about:
for s in l:
while True:
stuff()
# use a "break" instead of s = i.next()
Does that seem like something close to what you would want? With your code example, it would be:
for s in some_list:
while True:
if state is STATE_CODE:
if "//" in s:
tokens.add( TOKEN_COMMENT, s.split( "//" )[1] )
state = STATE_COMMENT
else :
tokens.add( TOKEN_CODE, s )
if state is STATE_COMMENT:
if "//" in s:
tokens.append( TOKEN_COMMENT, s.split( "//" )[1] )
break # get next s
else:
state = STATE_CODE
# re-evaluate same line
# continues automatically
Upvotes: 1321
Reputation: 235
The way I've done this is as follows...
condition = True
while condition:
do_stuff()
condition = (<something that evaluates to True or False>)
This seems to me to be the simplistic solution, I'm surprised I haven't seen it here already. This can obviously also be inverted to
while not condition:
etc.
Upvotes: 19
Reputation: 675
If you're in a scenario where you are looping while a resource is unavaliable or something similar that throws an exception, you could use something like
import time
while True:
try:
f = open('some/path', 'r')
except IOError:
print('File could not be read. Retrying in 5 seconds')
time.sleep(5)
else:
break
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 3743
My code below might be a useful implementation, highlighting the main difference between do-while vs while as I understand it.
So in this one case, you always go through the loop at least once.
first_pass = True
while first_pass or condition:
first_pass = False
do_stuff()
Upvotes: 102
Reputation: 91790
Quick hack:
def dowhile(func = None, condition = None):
if not func or not condition:
return
else:
func()
while condition():
func()
Use like so:
>>> x = 10
>>> def f():
... global x
... x = x - 1
>>> def c():
global x
return x > 0
>>> dowhile(f, c)
>>> print x
0
Upvotes: 6
Reputation: 6841
See if this helps :
Set a flag inside the exception handler and check it before working on the s.
flagBreak = false;
while True :
if flagBreak : break
if s :
print s
try :
s = i.next()
except StopIteration :
flagBreak = true
print "done"
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 2321
for a do - while loop containing try statements
loop = True
while loop:
generic_stuff()
try:
questionable_stuff()
# to break from successful completion
# loop = False
except:
optional_stuff()
# to break from unsuccessful completion -
# the case referenced in the OP's question
loop = False
finally:
more_generic_stuff()
alternatively, when there's no need for the 'finally' clause
while True:
generic_stuff()
try:
questionable_stuff()
# to break from successful completion
# break
except:
optional_stuff()
# to break from unsuccessful completion -
# the case referenced in the OP's question
break
Upvotes: 8
Reputation: 4085
Here's a very simple way to emulate a do-while loop:
condition = True
while condition:
# loop body here
condition = test_loop_condition()
# end of loop
The key features of a do-while loop are that the loop body always executes at least once, and that the condition is evaluated at the bottom of the loop body. The control structure show here accomplishes both of these with no need for exceptions or break statements. It does introduce one extra Boolean variable.
Upvotes: 406
Reputation: 571
do {
stuff()
} while (condition())
->
while True:
stuff()
if not condition():
break
You can do a function:
def do_while(stuff, condition):
while condition(stuff()):
pass
But 1) It's ugly. 2) Condition should be a function with one parameter, supposed to be filled by stuff (it's the only reason not to use the classic while loop.)
Upvotes: 41
Reputation: 49833
Here is a crazier solution of a different pattern -- using coroutines. The code is still very similar, but with one important difference; there are no exit conditions at all! The coroutine (chain of coroutines really) just stops when you stop feeding it with data.
def coroutine(func):
"""Coroutine decorator
Coroutines must be started, advanced to their first "yield" point,
and this decorator does this automatically.
"""
def startcr(*ar, **kw):
cr = func(*ar, **kw)
cr.next()
return cr
return startcr
@coroutine
def collector(storage):
"""Act as "sink" and collect all sent in @storage"""
while True:
storage.append((yield))
@coroutine
def state_machine(sink):
""" .send() new parts to be tokenized by the state machine,
tokens are passed on to @sink
"""
s = ""
state = STATE_CODE
while True:
if state is STATE_CODE :
if "//" in s :
sink.send((TOKEN_COMMENT, s.split( "//" )[1] ))
state = STATE_COMMENT
else :
sink.send(( TOKEN_CODE, s ))
if state is STATE_COMMENT :
if "//" in s :
sink.send(( TOKEN_COMMENT, s.split( "//" )[1] ))
else
state = STATE_CODE
# re-evaluate same line
continue
s = (yield)
tokens = []
sm = state_machine(collector(tokens))
for piece in i:
sm.send(piece)
The code above collects all tokens as tuples in tokens
and I assume there is no difference between .append()
and .add()
in the original code.
Upvotes: 17
Reputation: 134681
Exception will break the loop, so you might as well handle it outside the loop.
try:
while True:
if s:
print s
s = i.next()
except StopIteration:
pass
I guess that the problem with your code is that behaviour of break
inside except
is not defined. Generally break
goes only one level up, so e.g. break
inside try
goes directly to finally
(if it exists) an out of the try
, but not out of the loop.
Related PEP: http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3136
Related question: Breaking out of nested loops
Upvotes: 35