CODEWITHSUNDEEP
javalambdajava-11type-inference
Adam
Adam

Reputation: 41

Why should I use local-variable type Inference for lambda parameters if I can skip it?

Java 11 introduced local-variable type Inference for lambda parameters. For example:

Stream.of("a", "b", "c").map((var a) -> "ok")

My question is: why should I use it, if I can skip it. For example:

Stream.of("a", "b", "c").map(a -> "ok")

?

Upvotes: 0

Views: 262

Answers (1)

Thomas Kläger
Thomas Kläger

Reputation: 21560

The JEP 323 states the following goal:

  • Align the syntax of a formal parameter declaration in an implicitly typed lambda expression with the syntax of a local variable declaration.

And it states as motiviation:

A lambda expression may be implicitly typed, where the types of all its formal parameters are inferred:

    (x, y) -> x.process(y)    // implicitly typed lambda expression

Java SE 10 makes implicit typing available for local variables:

    var x = new Foo();
    for (var x : xs) { ... }
    try (var x = ...) { ... } catch ...

For uniformity with local variables, we wish to allow 'var' for the formal parameters of an implicitly typed lambda expression:

    (var x, var y) -> x.process(y)   // implicit typed lambda expression

One benefit of uniformity is that modifiers, notably annotations, can be applied to local variables and lambda formals without losing brevity:

    @Nonnull var x = new Foo();
    (@Nonnull var x, @Nullable var y) -> x.process(y)

Should you use it if you can skip it?

There might be contexts where you are required to use it (if you work in a project with a rigid coding convention that mandates the use). In other contexts it is probably opinion based.

My specific opinion: if you don't need it then don't use it.

  • You will need it if you need to annotate the lambda parameters
  • otherwise leave it out

Upvotes: 6

Related Questions