Reputation: 2788
Can I use an anonymous type as a return type in a Function, and then stuff that returned value into an array or collection of some sort whilst also adding an additional field to the new array/collection? excuse my pseudocode...
private var GetRowGroups(string columnName)
{
var groupQuery = from table in _dataSetDataTable.AsEnumerable()
group table by new { column1 = table[columnName] }
into groupedTable
select new
{
groupName = groupedTable.Key.column1,
rowSpan = groupedTable.Count()
};
return groupQuery;
}
private void CreateListofRowGroups()
{
var RowGroupList = new List<????>();
RowGroupList.Add(GetRowGroups("col1"));
RowGroupList.Add(GetRowGroups("col2"));
RowGroupList.Add(GetRowGroups("col3"));
}
Upvotes: 28
Views: 45677
Reputation: 94645
No you can't return an anonymous type from the method. For more info read this MSDN doc. Use class
or struct
instead of an anonymous
type.
You should read blog post - Horrible grotty hack: returning an anonymous type instance
If you are using framework 4.0 then you can return List<dynamic>
but be careful to access the properties of anonymous object.
private List<dynamic> GetRowGroups(string columnName)
{
var groupQuery = from table in _dataSetDataTable.AsEnumerable()
group table by new { column1 = table[columnName] }
into groupedTable
select new
{
groupName = groupedTable.Key.column1,
rowSpan = groupedTable.Count()
};
return groupQuery.ToList<dynamic>();
}
Upvotes: 21
Reputation: 37000
From C#7 you can return a list of tuples:
private IEnumerable<(string, string)> GetRowGroups(string columnName)
{
return from table in _dataSetDataTable.AsEnumerable()
group table by new { column1 = table[columnName] }
into groupedTable
select (groupedTable.Key.column1, groupedTable.Count());
}
You can even give the members of the tuple names:
private IEnumerable<(string groupName, string rowSpan)> GetRowGroups(string columnName)
{
return from table in _dataSetDataTable.AsEnumerable()
group table by new { column1 = table[columnName] }
into groupedTable
select (groupedTable.Key.column1, groupedTable.Count());
}
However you need System.ValueTuple
from the Nuget Package Manager.
Anyway I suggest to give things a clear name that includes what their purpose is, in particular when this is part of a public API. Having said this you should consider to create a class that holds those properties and return a list of that type.
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 56769
This is a very popular question. In general you cannot return an anonymous type due to the requirement of strong typing. However there are a couple of workarounds.
Upvotes: 21
Reputation: 1442
Just use and ArrayList
public static ArrayList GetMembersItems(string ProjectGuid)
{
ArrayList items = new ArrayList();
items.AddRange(yourVariable
.Where(p => p.yourproperty == something)
.ToList());
return items;
}
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 1925
Use object
, not var
. You'll have to use reflection to access the properties outside the scope of the anonymous type though.
i.e.
private object GetRowGroups(string columnName)
...
var RowGroupList = new List<object>();
...
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 41882
No, you can't return an anonymous type directly, but you can return it using an impromptu interface. Something like this:
public interface IMyInterface
{
string GroupName { get; }
int RowSpan { get; }
}
private IEnumerable<IMyInterface> GetRowGroups()
{
var list =
from item in table
select new
{
GroupName = groupedTable.Key.column1,
RowSpan = groupedTable.Count()
}
.ActLike<IMyInterface>();
return list;
}
Upvotes: 4