Reputation: 211
OR other way to formulate my question (though it didn't solve my problem): 'QObject::QObject' cannot access private member declared in class 'QObject'
I need SIGNALs and SLOTS functionality in my class, but I assume it is not possible without to derive from QObject
?
class MyClass
{
signals:
importantSignal();
public slots:
importantSlot();
};
The Problem seems to be that I need to derive from QObject
to use signals and slots ... but I need the default contructor of MyClass
. But I can't construct them because of the following feature of QObject
:
No Copy Constructor or Assignment Operator.
I tried a lot ...
So my shoul Class look like that:
#include <QObject>
class MyClass: public QObject
{
Q_OBJECT
public:
explicit MyClass(QObject *parent = 0); //autogenerated by qtcreator for QObject derived class
MyClass(const MyClass * other);
signals:
importantSignal();
public slots:
importantSlot();
};
I need the default contructor of MyClass
.
So is there any possibility do avoid the "'QObject::QObject' cannot access private member declared in class 'QObject'" error?
Or as an alternative is there any possibility to use signals and slots without QObject
?
I'm glad for any advice.
Upvotes: 19
Views: 24342
Reputation: 98505
Just because QObject
is not copyable doesn't mean that you have to copy it when your class is copied, or assigned to, etc. Specifically, all you need to do is to insulate your class from QObject's copy and assignment operators (because they are deleted).
Typically, you'd factor out the "copyable non-copyable QObject" into a separate class:
// main.cpp
#include <QObject>
#include <QVariant>
class CopyableQObject : public QObject
{
protected:
explicit CopyableQObject(QObject* parent = nullptr) : QObject(parent) {}
CopyableQObject(const CopyableQObject& other) { initFrom(other); }
CopyableQObject(CopyableQObject&& other) { initFrom(other); }
CopyableQObject& operator=(const CopyableQObject& other)
{
return initFrom(other), *this;
}
CopyableQObject& operator=(CopyableQObject&& other)
{
return initFrom(other), *this;
}
private:
void initFrom(const CopyableQObject& other)
{
setParent(other.parent());
setObjectName(other.objectName());
}
void initFrom(CopyableQObject& other)
{
initFrom(const_cast<const CopyableQObject&>(other));
for (QObject* child : other.children())
child->setParent( this );
for (auto& name : other.dynamicPropertyNames())
setProperty(name, other.property(name));
}
};
You can copy whatever attributes you desire between the QObject
instances. Above, the parent and object name are copied. Furthermore, when moving from another object, its children are reparented, and dynamic property names are transferred as well.
Now the CopyableQObject
adapter implements all the constructors that will allow derived classes to be copy-constructible, copy-assignable, move-constructible and move-assignable.
All your class needs to do is derive from the adapter class above:
class MyClass : public CopyableQObject
{
Q_OBJECT
public:
Q_SIGNAL void signal1();
Q_SIGNAL void signal2();
};
We can test that it works:
int main()
{
int counter = 0;
MyClass obj1;
MyClass obj2;
Q_SET_OBJECT_NAME(obj1);
QObject::connect(&obj1, &MyClass::signal1, [&]{ counter += 0x1; });
QObject::connect(&obj1, &MyClass::signal2, [&]{ counter += 0x10; });
QObject::connect(&obj2, &MyClass::signal1, [&]{ counter += 0x100; });
QObject::connect(&obj2, &MyClass::signal2, [&]{ counter += 0x1000; });
Q_ASSERT(counter == 0);
emit obj1.signal1();
emit obj1.signal2();
Q_ASSERT(counter == 0x11);
QObject obj3(&obj1);
Q_ASSERT(obj3.parent() == &obj1);
const auto name1 = obj1.objectName();
obj2 = std::move(obj1);
Q_ASSERT(obj3.parent() == &obj2);
Q_ASSERT(obj2.objectName() == name1);
emit obj2.signal1();
emit obj2.signal2();
Q_ASSERT(counter == 0x1111);
}
#include "main.moc"
This concludes the complete, compileable example.
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 18341
In Qt5, you use QObject::connect
to connect signal
with slot
:
/*
QMetaObject::Connection QObject::connect(
const QObject *sender,
const char *signal,
const char *method,
Qt::ConnectionType type = Qt::AutoConnection) const;
*/
#include <QApplication>
#include <QDebug>
#include <QLineEdit>
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
QApplication app(argc, argv);
QLineEdit lnedit;
// connect signal `QLineEdit::textChanged` with slot `lambda function`
QObject::connect(&lnedit, &QLineEdit::textChanged, [&](){qDebug()<<lnedit.text()<<endl;});
lnedit.show();
return app.exec();
}
The result:
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 16121
Since Qt5 you can just connect to any function
connect(&timer, &QTimer::finished,
&instanceOfMyClass, &MyClass::fancyMemberFunction);
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 33435
If you want a copyable object with QObject
features you need membership (by pointer) rather than inheritence.
You can derive a class Handler
from QObject
where Handler
's slots call SomeInterface
virtual functions on its parent.
struct NonQObjectHandler {
virtual ~ NonQObjectHandler () {}
virtual void receive (int, float) = 0;
};
class Handler : public NonQObjectHandler {
struct Receiver;
std :: unique_ptr <Receiver> m_receiver;
void receive (int, float); // NonQObjectHandler
public:
Handler ();
Handler (const Handler &); // This is what you're really after
};
class Handler :: Receiver : public QObject {
Q_OBJECT
private:
NonQObjectHandler * m_handler;
private slots:
void receive (int, float); // Calls m_handler's receive
public:
Receiver (NonQObjectHandler *);
};
Handler :: Handler ()
: m_receiver (new Receiver (this))
{
}
Handler :: Handler (const Handler & old)
: m_receiver (new Receiver (this))
{
// Copy over any extra state variables also, but
// Receiver is created anew.
}
Handler :: Receiver :: Receiver (NonQObjectHandler * h)
: m_handler (h)
{
connect (foo, SIGNAL (bar (int, float)), this, SLOT (receive (int, float)));
}
void Handler :: Receiver :: receive (int i, float f)
{
m_handler -> receive (i, f);
}
Upvotes: 13
Reputation: 10730
You cannot use Qt's signal/slot mechanisms without using QObject
/Q_OBJECT
.
You theoretically could create a dummy QObject and compose it into your class. The dummy would then forward the slot calls to your class. You will probably run in to issues with lifetime management, for the reasons that Liz has described in her comment.
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 32538
If you want to implement event-driven functionality using a signals/slots pattern, but do not want to work inside the confines of Qt (i.e., you want to use your class inside of STL containers, etc. that require copy-constructors), I would suggest using Boost::signal.
Otherwise, no, you can't possibly do what you're wanting without deriving from QObject
since that base class is what handles the Qt runtime signals/slots functionality.
Upvotes: 7