CODEWITHSUNDEEP
c++performanceparticle-system
Ben
Ben

Reputation: 16669

2D Particle System - Performance

I have implemented a 2D Particle System based on the ideas and concepts outlined in "Bulding an Advanced Particle System" (John van der Burg, Game Developer Magazine, March 2000).

Now I am wondering what performance I should expect from this system. I am currently testing it within the context of my simple (unfinished) SDL/OpenGL platformer, where all particles are updated every frame. Drawing is done as follows

// Bind Texture
glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, *texture);
// for all particles
    glBegin(GL_QUADS);
    glTexCoord2d(0,0);  glVertex2f(x,y);
    glTexCoord2d(1,0);  glVertex2f(x+w,y);
    glTexCoord2d(1,1);  glVertex2f(x+w,y+h);
    glTexCoord2d(0,1);  glVertex2f(x,y+h);
    glEnd();

where one texture is used for all particles.

It runs smoothly up to about 3000 particles. To be honest I was expecting a lot more, particularly since this is meant to be used with more than one system on screen. What number of particles should I expect to be displayed smoothly?

PS: I am relatively new to C++ and OpenGL likewise, so it might well be that I messed up somewhere!?

EDIT Using POINT_SPRITE

glEnable(GL_POINT_SPRITE);
glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, *texture);
glTexEnvi(GL_POINT_SPRITE, GL_COORD_REPLACE, GL_TRUE); 

// for all particles
    glBegin(GL_POINTS);
    glPointSize(size);
    glVertex2f(x,y);
    glEnd();

glDisable( GL_POINT_SPRITE );

Can't see any performance difference to using GL_QUADS at all!?

EDIT Using VERTEX_ARRAY

// Setup
glEnable (GL_POINT_SPRITE);                                         
glTexEnvi(GL_POINT_SPRITE, GL_COORD_REPLACE, GL_TRUE);              
glPointSize(20);                                    

// A big array to hold all the points
const int NumPoints = 2000;
Vector2 ArrayOfPoints[NumPoints];
for (int i = 0; i < NumPoints; i++) {
    ArrayOfPoints[i].x = 350 + rand()%201;
    ArrayOfPoints[i].y = 350 + rand()%201;
}

// Rendering
glEnableClientState(GL_VERTEX_ARRAY);     // Enable vertex arrays
glVertexPointer(2, GL_FLOAT, 0, ArrayOfPoints);     // Specify data
glDrawArrays(GL_POINTS, 0, NumPoints);  // ddraw with points, starting from the 0'th point in my array and draw exactly NumPoints

Using VAs made a performance difference to the above. I've then tried VBOs, but don't really see a performance difference there?

Upvotes: 2

Views: 3864

Answers (2)

Shelling
Shelling

Reputation: 429

I can't say how much you can expect from that solution, but there are some ways to improve it.

Firstly, by using glBegin() and glEnd() you are using immediate mode, which is, as far as I know, the slowest way of doing things. Furthermore, it isn't even present in the current OpenGL standard anymore.

For OpenGL 2.1

Point Sprites:

You might want to use point sprites. I implemented a particle system using them and came up with a nice performance (for my knowledge back then, at least). Using point sprites you are doing less OpenGL calls per frame and you send less data to the graphic card (or even have the data stored at the graphic card, not sure about that). A short google search should even give you some implementations of that to look at.

Vertex Arrays:

If using point sprites doesn't help, you should consider using vertex arrays in combination with point sprites (to save a bit of memory). Basically, you have to store the vertex data of the particles in an array. You then enable vertex array support by calling glEnableClientState() with GL_VERTEX_ARRAY as parameter. After that, you call glVertexPointer() (the parameters are explained in the OpenGL documentation) and call glDrawArrays() to draw the particles. This will reduce your OpenGL calls to only a handfull instead of 3000 calls per frame.

For OpenGL 3.3 and above

Instancing:

If you are programming against OpenGL 3.3 or above, you can even consider using instancing to draw your particles, which should speed that up even further. Again, a short google search will let you look at some code about that.

In General:

Using SSE:

In addition, some time might be lost while updating your vertex positions. So, if you want to speed that up, you can take a look at using SSE for updating them. If done correctly, you will gain a lot of performance (at a large amount of particles at least)

Data Layout:

Finally, I recently found a link (divergentcoder.com/programming/aos-soa-explorations-part-1, thanks Ben) about structures of arrays (SoA) and arrays of structures (AoS). They were compared on how they affect the performance with an example of a particle system.

Upvotes: 4

mwd
mwd

Reputation: 420

Consider using vertex arrays instead of immediate mode (glBegin/End): http://www.songho.ca/opengl/gl_vertexarray.html

If you are willing to get into shaders, you could also search for "vertex shader" and consider using that approach for your project.

Upvotes: 1

Related Questions