CODEWITHSUNDEEP
performance-testingvirtualizationloadrunnermicrofocuspoc
Aditya Singh
Aditya Singh

Reputation: 54

Load Runner- Network Virtualization: No NV Graph Visualization and incorrect location wise Response Time

I am trying to do a PoC on Load Runner- Network Virtualization. PFB Scenario Details:

  1. Demo Site: https://petstore.octoperf.com/actions/Catalog.action
  2. Machine: Office Laptop
  3. #Locations: 4 ->Location Configurations: enter image description here
  4. 1 User to each location (total=4 Users).
  5. Duration: 10-15 minutes

Expected Result:

  1. Transaction having higher response time of the Location- London and Paris as compared to that of Mumbai and Goa.
  2. NV Graphs Visualization- Packet Loss, Average Throughput, Average Bandwidth Utilization, etc.

But in actual, I am getting below observations from my test:

  1. Empty Graphs:enter image description here

  2. Inconsistent response time from different locations (NV Insights): Ideally considering latency, the response time of London and Paris should have been more than 1.6 seconds for each transactions. Important Transactions' SS given->enter image description here, enter image description here

  3. Average Response time for different regions: enter image description here

Questions:

I have tried adding the outbound for NV port in Firewall but the results remain the same. Can someone please guide what I am missing or doing wrong?

Upvotes: -1

Views: 163

Answers (1)

Aditya Singh
Aditya Singh

Reputation: 54

My machine had more than one NIC (Wi-Fi and Ethernet) and it was not selected. Once I selected (Wi-Fi), got the expected results.

Resource Link: https://admhelp.microfocus.com/nv/en/nv-perform/en/Latest/help/Content/NV4HP/Active_adapter.htm?Highlight=active%20adapter

Reference from LoadRunner Community: https://community.microfocus.com/adtd/loadrunner/f/sws-loadrunner_sf/522531/load-runner--network-virtualization-no-nv-graph-visualization-and-incorrect-location-wise-response-time/1928166

Upvotes: 0

Related Questions