Reputation: 9091
Is there a Haskell interpreter that accepts type definitions or preferably all kinds of statements?
I've already tried ghci
and hugs
and none of these does that. Is there some particular reason that this is hard/impossible?
Upvotes: 7
Views: 321
Reputation: 9437
It seems that it will soon be fixed in GHCi, see:
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/4929
Upvotes: 13
Reputation: 668
Traditionally, the answer to this has been that code written at an interactive prompt lives inside the IO monad. It's as if there's a shadow main = do
hiding behind the Prelude>
. Think about it that way, and the absence of type declarations and top level declaration syntax makes sense, as do all the let
statements.
But Ptival is right: it looks like we won't have to worry about any of that soon.
Upvotes: 3