Reputation: 139
I am trying to improve performance for my application by trying baseprofile but unable to run it. Configured the project with gradle 8.2 and
'androidx.profileinstaller:profileinstaller:1.3.1'
'androidx.benchmark:benchmark-macro-junit4:1.2.2'
I was able to generate baseline-prof.txt using emulator but could not test performance by running the benchmark snippet
@RunWith(AndroidJUnit4::class)
@LargeTest
class StartupBenchmarks {
@get:Rule
val rule = MacrobenchmarkRule()
@Test
fun startupCompilationNone() =
benchmark(CompilationMode.None())
@Test
fun startupCompilationBaselineProfiles() =
benchmark(CompilationMode.Partial(BaselineProfileMode.Require))
private fun benchmark(compilationMode: CompilationMode) {
rule.measureRepeated(
packageName = "com.example.android",
metrics = listOf(StartupTimingMetric()),
compilationMode = compilationMode,
startupMode = StartupMode.COLD,
iterations = 1,
setupBlock = {
pressHome()
},
measureBlock = {
startActivityAndWait()
device.wait(Until.hasObject(By.text("Exit")),10_000)
}
)
}
}
Getting the below errors for the benchmark tests
startupCompilationNone()
java.lang.RuntimeException: The baseline profile install broadcast was not received. This most likely means that the profileinstaller library is missing from the target apk.
startupCompilationBaselineProfiles()
java.lang.IllegalStateException: The DROP_SHADER_CACHE broadcast was not received. This most likely means that the `androidx.profileinstaller` library used by the target apk is old. Please use `1.3.0-alpha02` or newer. For more information refer to the release notes at https://developer.android.com/jetpack/androidx/releases/profileinstaller.
Not sure what is going wrong, I am trying with all the latest available libs and also tested with multiple devices Pixel, motoE, OnePlus with disabling battery optimization.
Any direction of help is highly appreciated
Upvotes: 1
Views: 926
Reputation: 139
The issue was unrelated to the above error. The profileinstaller issue getting in Test results tab was misleading. Found there was a proguard TypeToken issue in gson. Adding the below lines in progaurd fixed the issue
-keep class com.google.gson.reflect.TypeToken
-keep class * extends com.google.gson.reflect.TypeToken
-keep public class * implements java.lang.reflect.Type
Upvotes: 0