Reputation: 2844
When I implement an event in Visual Studio, Resharper is kind enough to offer to create an event invocator for me. I usually did this by hand in the past, and my invocators always looked like this
private void InvokePropertyChanged(PropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
if (PropertyChanged != null)
{
PropertyChanged(this, e);
}
}
but the invocator created by Resharper looks like this (cleaned up a little by hand)
private void InvokePropertyChanged(PropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
PropertyChangedEventHandler changed = PropertyChanged;
if (changed != null)
{
changed(this, e);
}
}
Do the people at jetbrains know something about c# I don't? Is there some technical advantage to having the local variable, or is it just an artifact of them having to auto-generate the code?
Upvotes: 6
Views: 1801
Reputation: 564641
This is only an issue for multithreading. This protects you in a multithreaded environment.
For example, take this scenario:
if (PropertyChanged != null) // PropertyChanged has one subscriber here
{
Now, a second thread unsubscribes here, modifying the event handler....
PropertyChanged(this, e); // This is no longer valid!
}
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 48147
I think John Saunders probably has the best answer.
For the record, I don't even write "Invocators" anymore. I have extension methods that do it for me, and I just call PropertyChanged.Fire(this, "propName");
See this article for more info.
Upvotes: 5
Reputation: 161791
Yes. They know that the number of subscribers to an event can change between the "if" and the call to the event handler. They capture it in a local, where it doesn't change any more.
Upvotes: 8