Reputation: 566
This is part of the RFC 5545 specification, which is based on the ISO 8601:
Format Definition: This value type is defined by the following
notation:
dur-value = (["+"] / "-") "P" (dur-date / dur-time / dur-week)
dur-date = dur-day [dur-time]
dur-time = "T" (dur-hour / dur-minute / dur-second)
dur-week = 1*DIGIT "W"
dur-hour = 1*DIGIT "H" [dur-minute]
dur-minute = 1*DIGIT "M" [dur-second]
dur-second = 1*DIGIT "S"
dur-day = 1*DIGIT "D"
I do not quite understand the dur-value
formatting. I think that the /
stand for an or
right? That means that you should not be able to mix dur-date
, dur-time
and dur-week
?
If that is the case then the chaining of dur-date = dur-day [dur-time]
actually permits the use of dur-date
and dur-time
in the same duration value, but forbids that dur-week
is mixed with anything else.
So this P1W1D
duration value would be invalid?
Upvotes: 1
Views: 155
Reputation: 56026
Yes. Otherwise it should have read:
dur-week = 1*DIGIT "W" [dur-date]
or perhaps:
dur-week = 1*DIGIT "W" ([dur-date] / [dur-time])
Upvotes: 0