CODEWITHSUNDEEP
rlinear-regressiontidymodels
phasedarray
phasedarray

Reputation: 49

What is the difference between setting the engine parameter in linear_reg() implicitly vs. explicitly?

I am doing a course on linear regression with R using the tidymodels package and the sample code for specifying the linear regression model is:

linear_model_specification <- linear_reg() %>%
                                           set_engine(engine = "lm")

i.e. using the pipe operator and the set_engine() function. However, I do not understand the need to do this, as engine = "lm" is already the default argument in linear_reg. As far as I can see, the following code does the exact same thing without the need to use the pipe operator or set_engine():

linear_model_specification <- linear_reg()

Is there a programming reason to use set_engine() or was this done only for illustration purposes?

Upvotes: 1

Views: 32

Answers (1)

topepo
topepo

Reputation: 14316

Either approach is fine.

If you want to set engine-specific parameters (or mark them for tuning), the more verbose set_engine("lm") would be required.

Bonus points: you can also set the mode in the first function (if the model can fit different modes). So you could do:

rand_forest("classification", "aorsf")

instead of

rand_forest() %>% 
  set_mode("classification") %>% 
  set_engine("aorsf")

if you have no additional arguments to specify.

Upvotes: 0

Related Questions