Reputation: 11250
I have noticed that when I look at a rule I have written say for example:
label {
font-size: 12px;
position: absolute;
padding: 9px;
color: #666;
}
In firebug, it translates as:
label {
color: #666;
font-size: 12px;
padding: 9px;
position: absolute;
}
Basically, reordering the styles. Why?
Is there an 'ultimate' priority I could be putting in my styles to improve load speeds? Ie is there a load order I'm unaware of?
Upvotes: 2
Views: 118
Reputation: 33449
Well, as the others stated before, the order is important in letting the browser choose, which rule to use, but in order of performance I haven't heard of something like this. As CSS is just a text file the downloading speed will not be affected. BUt I don't think anyone has examined this topic with some test cases.
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 31928
The order of styles in your rule does not matter. Firebug seems to sort alphabetically in your case (it may be incidental).
Of course the order will do play role in this, problematic, case:
.foo {
background: url(foo.png) top left repeat-x;
background-image: url(bar.png);
}
Upvotes: 3
Reputation: 121871
In general: Yes, order does matter in terms of what properties will actually be set.
You can Google for many links on CSS precedence, for example:
http://www.vanseodesign.com/css/css-specificity-inheritance-cascaade/
But as far as what you see in the debugger - that's not at all significant for how the CSS will actually be rendered. The order of "color", "font-size", "padding" and "position" in this particular class are simply an artifact of Firebug.
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 1039
Yes the order matters:
label {
font-size: 12px;
position: absolute;
padding: 9px;
color: #666;
font-size: 15px;
}
The font-size (15px) will overrule the 12px
Upvotes: 1