CODEWITHSUNDEEP
c#.netc#-4.0.net-4.0
Standage
Standage

Reputation: 1517

Array, Arraylist or list of lists?

I was going to use a standard array, I need it to x number of rows and be 2 columns 

double[,] members = new double[x, 2];

and loop through all the results I get back and then add them to the array, but as the number of results can change I don't want to pre-define the size of the array...

members[0, 0] = cost;
members[x, 1] = tax;
x++;

I was looking at resizing the array but would it be easier just using an arraylist or list of lists for this?

Upvotes: 2

Views: 2247

Answers (4)

Otiel
Otiel

Reputation: 18743

Use a List<T>.

From msdn:

ArrayList has been replaced by List<T> which is faster, and has more features.

T could be a List<double> or a double[2] or a struct or a 2-tuple... but as stated by Marc, using a List<List<double>> is over-doing things if the nested List is destined to always have two items.

Upvotes: 1

Mat&#237;as Fidemraizer
Mat&#237;as Fidemraizer

Reputation: 64943

Perhaps the number of items in the second dimension is fixed, or at least, is predictable, so if you're using Microsoft .NET Framework 4.0, you can use a list of tuples:

List<Tuple<double, double>> list = new List<Tuple<int, int>>();

// In your loop...
list.Add(Tuple.Create(cost, tax));

// ... later when retrieving some tuple...
int item0cost = list[0].Item1;
int item0tax = list[0].Item2;

You can always implement some kind of value object class which has Cost and Tax properties, but using tuples you can do it as easy as I shown you in my code sample.

Upvotes: 2

Marc Gravell
Marc Gravell

Reputation: 1064244

I would have a list of some type, where that type has a cost and a tax.

If space is a premium, it could be a struct with two doubles (btw, would decimal be more appropriate? It is almost always is a better choice for money), but if so: make it immutable.

For example:

public struct YourType {
    private readonly decimal cost, tax;
    public decimal Cost { get { return cost; } }
    public decimal Tax { get { return tax; } }
    public YourType(decimal cost, decimal tax) {
        this.cost = cost;
        this.tax = tax;
    }
}

With:

List<YourType> list = new List<YourType>();

Upvotes: 6

SLaks
SLaks

Reputation: 888283

You should use a List<List<int>>.

Upvotes: 1

Related Questions