Reputation: 38199
I have some static resources (images and HTML files) that will be localized. One piece of software I've seen do this is Apache, which appends the locale to the name; for example, test_en_US.html
or test_de_CH.html
. I'm wondering whether this naming scheme is considered standard, or whether every project does it differently.
Upvotes: 5
Views: 4826
Reputation: 951
While there is no documented standard for naming Localized files, I'd recommend using the format filename[_language[ _country]] where
For example:
Why? This is the most typical format used by operating systems, globalization tools (such as Trados and WorldServer), and programming languages. So unless you have a particular fondness for a different format, I see no reason to deviate from what most other folks are doing. It may save you some integration headaches down the road.
Upvotes: 12
Reputation: 1
You should always use the "de-facto" standard, which is the unix/posix way with gettext
. And you shoud use gettext
to make your localization!
Therefore one and only correct way is to use localization naming like this:
en
en_US
en_UK
Some applications and especially Java developers ar sometimes using the en-US
(hyphenated instead than underscored) and it is ALL WRONG!!!
gettext standard is this and only this:
locale
|_en_US
|_LC_MESSAGES
|_appname.mo
Where:
locale
- Name of the directory, can vary but it is highly recommended to stay with "locale"-name
en_US
- Any standard locale like *es_ES*, *es_PT*, ...
LC_MESSAGES
- mandatory and cannot be changed!
appname.mo - msgfmt compiled appname.po file (appname is what ever you want)
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 56604
While there doesn't appear to a standard conventions as to where in the file name to place them, the international codes for language (e.g. "en") and region (e.g. "en-US") are both very common and very straightforward. Variations I've seen, excluding "enUS" vs. "en_US" vs. "en-US":
I personally favor the first and last variants. The former for grouping files by name/resource (good for situations in which a limited number of files need localized) and the latter for grouping files by locale (better for situations with a large number of localized files).
Upvotes: 1