Reputation: 9385
I have implemented a recursive algorithm, to improve the performance I want to add a memoization table. The most natural structure for my problem would be
map<pair<int,int>,int> lookup_table;
and the recursive algorithm that I use is
int max_sum_path(int maximum_rows,vector<vector<int> >& matrix,int row_index,int colm_index)
{
if(row_index >= maximum_rows || colm_index > row_index)
{
//we have reached a cell outside the Triangular Matrix
return 0;
}
else if(lookup_table.find(row_index,colm_index) != lookup_table.end())
{
//the memoization step to avoid repeated calculations and make recursion more efficient
return lookup_table[row_index,colm_index];
}
else
{
lookup_table[row_index,colm_index] = matrix[row_index][colm_index] + max(max_sum_path(maximum_rows,matrix,row_index+1,colm_index), max_sum_path(maximum_rows,matrix,row_index+1,colm_index+1));
return lookup_table[row_index,colm_index];
}
}
This throws a tonne of compiler errors. I'm not sure if the syntax is correct. Should I be using a string buffer to create a string and then use it instead of the pair?
Here are the compiler errors:
sums_triangle.cpp: In function ‘int max_sum_path(int, std::vector<std::vector<int> >&, int, int)’:
sums_triangle.cpp:50:49: error: no matching function for call to ‘std::map<std::pair<int, int>, int>::find(int&, int&)’
sums_triangle.cpp:50:49: note: candidates are:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.6.2/../../../../include/c++/4.6.2/bits/stl_map.h:736:7: note: std::map<_Key, _Tp, _Compare, _Alloc>::iterator std::map<_Key, _Tp, _Compare, _Alloc>::find(const key_type&) [with _Key = std::pair<int, int>, _Tp = int, _Compare = std::less<std::pair<int, int> >, _Alloc = std::allocator<std::pair<const std::pair<int, int>, int> >, std::map<_Key, _Tp, _Compare, _Alloc>::iterator = std::_Rb_tree_iterator<std::pair<const std::pair<int, int>, int> >, std::map<_Key, _Tp, _Compare, _Alloc>::key_type = std::pair<int, int>]
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.6.2/../../../../include/c++/4.6.2/bits/stl_map.h:736:7: note: candidate expects 1 argument, 2 provided
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.6.2/../../../../include/c++/4.6.2/bits/stl_map.h:751:7: note: std::map<_Key, _Tp, _Compare, _Alloc>::const_iterator std::map<_Key, _Tp, _Compare, _Alloc>::find(const key_type&) const [with _Key = std::pair<int, int>, _Tp = int, _Compare = std::less<std::pair<int, int> >, _Alloc = std::allocator<std::pair<const std::pair<int, int>, int> >, std::map<_Key, _Tp, _Compare, _Alloc>::const_iterator = std::_Rb_tree_const_iterator<std::pair<const std::pair<int, int>, int> >, std::map<_Key, _Tp, _Compare, _Alloc>::key_type = std::pair<int, int>]
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.6.2/../../../../include/c++/4.6.2/bits/stl_map.h:751:7: note: candidate expects 1 argument, 2 provided
sums_triangle.cpp:53:35: warning: left operand of comma operator has no effect [-Wunused-value]
sums_triangle.cpp:53:45: error: no match for ‘operator[]’ in ‘lookup_table[(0, colm_index)]’
sums_triangle.cpp:53:45: note: candidate is:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.6.2/../../../../include/c++/4.6.2/bits/stl_map.h:445:7: note: std::map<_Key, _Tp, _Compare, _Alloc>::mapped_type& std::map<_Key, _Tp, _Compare, _Alloc>::operator[](const key_type&) [with _Key = std::pair<int, int>, _Tp = int, _Compare = std::less<std::pair<int, int> >, _Alloc = std::allocator<std::pair<const std::pair<int, int>, int> >, std::map<_Key, _Tp, _Compare, _Alloc>::mapped_type = int, std::map<_Key, _Tp, _Compare, _Alloc>::key_type = std::pair<int, int>]
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.6.2/../../../../include/c++/4.6.2/bits/stl_map.h:445:7: note: no known conversion for argument 1 from ‘int’ to ‘const key_type& {aka const std::pair<int, int>&}’
sums_triangle.cpp:57:28: warning: left operand of comma operator has no effect [-Wunused-value]
sums_triangle.cpp:57:38: error: no match for ‘operator[]’ in ‘lookup_table[(0, colm_index)]’
sums_triangle.cpp:57:38: note: candidate is:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.6.2/../../../../include/c++/4.6.2/bits/stl_map.h:445:7: note: std::map<_Key, _Tp, _Compare, _Alloc>::mapped_type& std::map<_Key, _Tp, _Compare, _Alloc>::operator[](const key_type&) [with _Key = std::pair<int, int>, _Tp = int, _Compare = std::less<std::pair<int, int> >, _Alloc = std::allocator<std::pair<const std::pair<int, int>, int> >, std::map<_Key, _Tp, _Compare, _Alloc>::mapped_type = int, std::map<_Key, _Tp, _Compare, _Alloc>::key_type = std::pair<int, int>]
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.6.2/../../../../include/c++/4.6.2/bits/stl_map.h:445:7: note: no known conversion for argument 1 from ‘int’ to ‘const key_type& {aka const std::pair<int, int>&}’
sums_triangle.cpp:58:35: warning: left operand of comma operator has no effect [-Wunused-value]
sums_triangle.cpp:58:45: error: no match for ‘operator[]’ in ‘lookup_table[(0, colm_index)]’
sums_triangle.cpp:58:45: note: candidate is:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.6.2/../../../../include/c++/4.6.2/bits/stl_map.h:445:7: note: std::map<_Key, _Tp, _Compare, _Alloc>::mapped_type& std::map<_Key, _Tp, _Compare, _Alloc>::operator[](const key_type&) [with _Key = std::pair<int, int>, _Tp = int, _Compare = std::less<std::pair<int, int> >, _Alloc = std::allocator<std::pair<const std::pair<int, int>, int> >, std::map<_Key, _Tp, _Compare, _Alloc>::mapped_type = int, std::map<_Key, _Tp, _Compare, _Alloc>::key_type = std::pair<int, int>]
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.6.2/../../../../include/c++/4.6.2/bits/stl_map.h:445:7: note: no known conversion for argument 1 from ‘int’ to ‘const key_type& {aka const std::pair<int, int>&}’
sums_triangle.cpp:60:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type]
Just to be clear, I'm not sure if the syntax is correct. I want to know how I can use a pair as the key for a map.
Extra Info: I had asked this question earlier. I'm optimizing it now. Feel free to suggest a different structure for the memoization table.
Upvotes: 1
Views: 540
Reputation: 361612
Instead of this,
lookup_table.find(row_index,colm_index) //incorrect - your code
write this,
lookup_table.find(std::make_pair(row_index,colm_index)) //correct - my code
Similarly see these as well,
lookup_table[row_index,colm_index]; //incorrect - your code
lookup_table[std::make_pair(row_index,colm_index)]; //correct - my code
Since lookup_table
is std::map<std::pair<int,int>,int>
, its key type is std::pair<int,int>
, so the index to lookup_table
has to be its key, when you use []
operator.
std::make_pair
is a utility function which returns an object of type std::pair<int,int>
if both arguments to std::make_pair
are int
. Instead of writing, std::make_pair
, you can use std::pair<int,int>(row_index,colm_index)
but this looks cumbersome, that is why std::make_pair
is preferred.
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 27258
You can't access map<pair<int,int>,int>
using lookup_table[row_index,colm_index]
and find(row_index,colm_index)
. To access it, you have to create a pair of two ints.
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 122001
Store the row_index
and colm_index
in a std::pair
:
pair<int, int> map_key_value = std::make_pair(row_index, colm_index);
Then use map_key_value
in lookup_table.find()
and lookup_table[]
.
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 186
Unfortunately this is not python. You can't use this syntax:
lookup_table[row_index,colm_index]
You need do use make_pair() to create the pair:
lookup_table[std::make_pair(row_index,colm_index)]
Other than that, you probably should use the iterator returned from map.find() to return your memoized result. As it stands now, you are making the lookup twice.
Upvotes: 1