Reputation: 1153
I'm new to NMock and mocking in general. Is it possible to redefine an expectation ? In fact, I whant to mock an interface with many methods. So I decided to factorize common method expectations not to have to write them 1000 times. My issue is the following : I have a method to stub that loads a file. In most cases, the mock will do nothing for this method. So I factorized the expectation in [SetUp]
Stub.On(myMock).Method("Load").Will(Return.Value(True));
But, In a test case, I want to test that the object using the mock responds well to an exception, so I put in my test method :
Stub.On(myMock).Method("Load").Will(Throw.Exception(new FileNotFoundException()));
When I debug the test, I see the Load method is returning True. I can anderstand this, but is it possible to reset exceptation for a method or redefine it ?
Upvotes: 2
Views: 1388
Reputation: 8776
I've never found a nice way to do this. I've had to use a custom action to set the value as needed for the specific call. Something like this:
[TestFixture]
public class Testing
{
public interface IXyz
{
bool Load();
}
public class DelegateAction<T> : NMock2.IAction
{
private Func<T> _resultFunc;
public void SetResultFunction(Func<T> func)
{
_resultFunc = func;
}
public DelegateAction(Func<T> resultFunc)
{
_resultFunc = resultFunc;
}
public void Invoke(Invocation invocation)
{
invocation.Result = _resultFunc();
}
public void DescribeTo(TextWriter writer)
{
}
}
private bool _result = true;
private DelegateAction<bool> _action;
[Test]
public void ResetTheReturnValue()
{
//would be done in general setup...
Mockery mocker = new Mockery();
IXyz test = mocker.NewMock<IXyz>();
_action = new DelegateAction<bool>(() => _result);
Stub.On(test).Method("Load").Will(_action);
//Reset for test.... - if you comment it out true is
//returned as default and the test passes
_action.SetResultFunction(() => { throw new Exception();});
Assert.IsTrue(test.Load());
}
}
I wouldn't normally allow the function to be set as I'd generally just want to return a different value ocasionally, which could be done by changing the field. Make sure to reset things at the end of the test.
Yes, I know this is pretty crappy and would love a better way if anyone knows of one. As an aside - if you aren't stuck with NMock you might want to take a look at something like Moq instead. I tend to have better results with it, although obviously your mileage may vary :)
Upvotes: 2