Reputation: 1821
What is the use of:
var flag = new Boolean(false);
compared to:
var flag = false;
When would you actually use new Boolean
?
Upvotes: 76
Views: 26494
Reputation:
Before the above question first the Boolean function, Boolean ()
Boolean(10 > 4) // return true
Boolean(4 > 9) // return false
Next: everything with real value return true. E.g
100
-4
4.4
"hello"
"false" // note even the string value false return true.
everthing without real value return false E.g
NaN
var x = 10 / "H"; // Boolean(x); return false.
undefined
""
0
-0
false
null
Now the Boolean
object is an object wrapper for a boolean value. The value passed as the first parameter is converted to a boolean value, if necessary. If value is omitted or is 0, -0, null, false, NaN, undefined
, or the empty string (""
), the object has an initial value of false. All other values, including any object or the string "false", create an object with an initial value of true.
This allows very powerful tricks.
Upvotes: 5
Reputation: 275
Interesting question:
You use new Boolean to create a boolean object. There can be many scenarios but I have discussed below one scenario.
Suppose you want a comparison in your code where you want to match string value and its datatype and it has to bool (true/false) then you will use new boolean instead of assigning simple false value.
var flag = false;
var flag2 = new Boolean (false);
alert(typeof flag); //boolean object
alert(typeof flag2); //simple object
if (flag === flag2){
alert("Value and datatype match");
}
else{
alert("Value and datatype do not match");
}
Upvotes: -1
Reputation: 153294
While others mentioned the theory, let me talk about the practical part:
Because Boolean
objects (as objects in general) are always truthy, it is considered bad practice to use them. In many years of JS programming, I have never used them, and I can't remember seeing Boolean
s in other peoples' code either. Not even once.
Using primitive values will avoid confusion and will make your code a little bit shorter.
If you ever need a bool wrapped in an object, you might as well use an Object
object like so:
foo = { value: false };
Also, calling the Boolean()
constructor as a function (as in foo = Boolean(bar)
) has the same effect as explicit typecasting using !!
, and the latter is generally preferred over the former.
Upvotes: 26
Reputation: 169833
The global function Boolean()
can be used for type casting when called without new
, eg
var foo = Boolean(bar); // equivalent to `var foo = !!bar`
When called with new
, a wrapper object will be created additionally, which means that you can assign arbitrary properties to the object:
var foo = new Boolean(bar); // equivalent to `var foo = Object(Boolean(bar));`
foo.baz = 'quux';
alert(foo.baz);
This is not possible with primitive values as primitives can't hold properties:
var foo = true;
foo.baz = 'quux';
alert(foo.baz); // `foo.baz` is `undefined`
Assigning a property to a primitive doesn't produce an error because of auto-boxing, ie
foo.baz = 'quux';
will be interpreted as
// create and immediately discard a wrapper object:
(new Boolean(foo)).baz = 'quux';
To get the primitive value back, you'll have to invoke the valueOf()
method. This is needed if you want to actually use the wrapped value, because objects always evaluate to true
in boolean contexts - even if the wrapped value is false
.
I've never come across a useful application of being able to assign properties to booleans, but boxing might be useful in cases where a reference to a primitive value is needed.
Upvotes: 78