Reputation: 18389
We create a Set
as:
Set myset = new HashSet()
How do we create a List
in Java?
Upvotes: 927
Views: 2720525
Reputation: 601
List can be created in many ways:
1 - Constructor Initialization
List is an interface, and the instances of List can be created in the following ways:
List<Integer> list=new ArrayList<Integer>();
List<Integer> llist=new LinkedList<Integer>();
List<Integer> stack=new Stack<Integer>();
2- Using Arrays.asList()
List<Integer> list=Arrays.asList(1, 2, 3);
3- Using Collections class methods
Empty List
List<Integer> list = Collections.EMPTY_LIST;
OR
List<Integer> list = Collections.emptyList();
Collections.addAll(list = new ArrayList<Integer>(), 1, 2, 3, 4);
Unmodifiable List
List<Integer> list = Collections
.unmodifiableList(Arrays.asList(1, 2, 3));
Singleton List
List<Integer> list = Collections.singletonList(2);
You can find more way from the reference link below.
Reference:
https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/initializing-a-list-in-java/
Upvotes: 6
Reputation: 5871
The following are some ways you can create lists.
java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException
if you try to do so. List<String> fixedSizeList = Arrays.asList(new String[] {"Male", "Female"});
List<String> fixedSizeList = Arrays.asList("Male", "Female");
List<String> fixedSizeList = List.of("Male", "Female"); //from java9
The following version is a simple list where you can add/remove any number of elements.
List<String> list = new ArrayList<>();
This is how to create a LinkedList
in java, If you need to do frequent insertion/deletion of elements on the list, you should use LinkedList
instead of ArrayList
List<String> linkedList = new LinkedList<>();
Upvotes: 15
Reputation: 1078
As declaration of array list in java is like
public class ArrayList<E> extends AbstractList<E> implements List<E>, RandomAccess, Cloneable, Serializable
There is numerous way you can create and initialize array list in java.
1) List list = new ArrayList();
2) List<type> myList = new ArrayList<>();
3) List<type> myList = new ArrayList<type>();
4) Using Utility class
List<Integer> list = Arrays.asList(8, 4);
Collections.unmodifiableList(Arrays.asList("a", "b", "c"));
5) Using static factory method
List<Integer> immutableList = List.of(1, 2);
6) Creation and initializing at a time
List<String> fixedSizeList = Arrays.asList(new String[] {"Male", "Female"});
Again you can create different types of list. All has their own characteristics
List a = new ArrayList();
List b = new LinkedList();
List c = new Vector();
List d = new Stack();
List e = new CopyOnWriteArrayList();
Upvotes: 10
Reputation: 16276
To create a non-empty list of fixed size (operations like add, remove, etc., are not supported):
List<Integer> list = Arrays.asList(1, 2); // but, list.set(...) is supported
To create a non-empty mutable list:
List<Integer> list = new ArrayList<>(Arrays.asList(3, 4));
Using a new List.of(...)
static factory methods:
List<Integer> immutableList = List.of(1, 2);
List<Integer> mutableList = new ArrayList<>(List.of(3, 4));
Using the Local Variable Type Inference:
var list1 = List.of(1, 2);
var list2 = new ArrayList<>(List.of(3, 4));
var list3 = new ArrayList<String>();
And follow best practices...
Since Java 5, generics have been a part of the language - you should use them:
List<String> list = new ArrayList<>(); // Good, List of String
List list = new ArrayList(); // Bad, don't do that!
For example, program to the List
interface:
List<Double> list = new ArrayList<>();
Instead of:
ArrayList<Double> list = new ArrayList<>(); // This is a bad idea!
Upvotes: 97
Reputation: 1725
As an option you can use double brace initialization here:
List<String> list = new ArrayList<String>(){
{
add("a");
add("b");
}
};
Upvotes: 7
Reputation: 24167
List
is an interface like Set
and has ArrayList
and LinkedList
as general purpose implementations.
We can create List as:
List<String> arrayList = new ArrayList<>();
List<String> linkedList = new LinkedList<>();
We can also create a fixed-size list as:
List<String> list = Arrays.asList("A", "B", "C");
We would almost always be using ArrayList
opposed to LinkedList
implementation:
LinkedList
uses a lot of space for objects and performs badly when we have lots of elements.LinkedList
requires O(n) time compared to O(1) in ArrayList
.The list created by Arrays.asList
above can not be modified structurally but its elements can still be modified.
As per doc, the method Collections.unmodifiableList
returns an unmodifiable view of the specified list. We can get it like:
Collections.unmodifiableList(Arrays.asList("A", "B", "C"));
In case we are using Java 9 then:
List<String> list = List.of("A", "B");
In case we are at Java 10 then the method Collectors.unmodifiableList
will return an instance of truly unmodifiable list introduced in Java 9. Check this answer for more info about the difference in Collections.unmodifiableList
vs Collectors.unmodifiableList
in Java 10.
Upvotes: 21
Reputation: 3795
If you need a serializable, immutable list with a single entity you can use:
List<String> singList = Collections.singletonList("stackoverlow");
Upvotes: 3
Reputation: 26769
List myList = new ArrayList();
or with generics (Java 7 or later)
List<MyType> myList = new ArrayList<>();
or with generics (Old java versions)
List<MyType> myList = new ArrayList<MyType>();
Upvotes: 1178
Reputation: 4633
Try this:
List<String> messages = Arrays.asList("bla1", "bla2", "bla3");
Or:
List<String> list1 = Lists.mutable.empty(); // Empty
List<String> list2 = Lists.mutable.of("One", "Two", "Three");
Upvotes: 3
Reputation: 122970
Additionally, if you want to create a list that has things in it (though it will be fixed size):
List<String> messages = Arrays.asList("Hello", "World!", "How", "Are", "You");
Upvotes: 600
Reputation: 29720
With Java 9, you are able to do the following to create an immutable List
:
List<Integer> immutableList = List.of(1, 2, 3, 4, 5);
List<Integer> mutableList = new ArrayList<>(immutableList);
Upvotes: 6
Reputation: 26748
Using Eclipse Collections you can create a List like this:
List<String> list1 = Lists.mutable.empty();
List<String> list2 = Lists.mutable.of("One", "Two", "Three");
If you want an immutable list:
ImmutableList<String> list3 = Lists.immutable.empty();
ImmutableList<String> list4 = Lists.immutable.of("One", "Two", "Three");
You can avoid auto-boxing by using primitive lists. Here's how you'd create int lists:
MutableIntList list5 = IntLists.mutable.empty();
MutableIntList list6 = IntLists.mutable.of(1, 2, 3);
ImmutableIntList list7 = IntLists.immutable.empty();
ImmutableIntList list8 = IntLists.immutable.of(1, 2, 3);
There are variants for all 8 primitives.
MutableLongList longList = LongLists.mutable.of(1L, 2L, 3L);
MutableCharList charList = CharLists.mutable.of('a', 'b', 'c');
MutableShortList shortList = ShortLists.mutable.of((short) 1, (short) 2, (short) 3);
MutableByteList byteList = ByteLists.mutable.of((byte) 1, (byte) 2, (byte) 3);
MutableBooleanList booleanList = BooleanLists.mutable.of(true, false);
MutableFloatList floatList = FloatLists.mutable.of(1.0f, 2.0f, 3.0f);
MutableDoubleList doubleList = DoubleLists.mutable.of(1.0, 2.0, 3.0);
Note: I am a committer for Eclipse Collections.
Upvotes: 4
Reputation: 7279
List list = new ArrayList();
Or with generics
List<String> list = new ArrayList<String>();
You can, of course, replace string with any type of variable, such as Integer, also.
Upvotes: 13
Reputation: 39456
Let me summarize and add something:
1. new ArrayList<String>();
2. Arrays.asList("A", "B", "C")
1. Lists.newArrayList("Mike", "John", "Lesly");
2. Lists.asList("A","B", new String [] {"C", "D"});
Immutable List
1. Collections.unmodifiableList(new ArrayList<String>(Arrays.asList("A","B")));
2. ImmutableList.builder() // Guava
.add("A")
.add("B").build();
3. ImmutableList.of("A", "B"); // Guava
4. ImmutableList.copyOf(Lists.newArrayList("A", "B", "C")); // Guava
Empty immutable List
1. Collections.emptyList();
2. Collections.EMPTY_LIST;
List of Characters
1. Lists.charactersOf("String") // Guava
2. Lists.newArrayList(Splitter.fixedLength(1).split("String")) // Guava
List of Integers
Ints.asList(1,2,3); // Guava
Upvotes: 214
Reputation: 3395
More options to do the same thing with Java 8, not better, not worse, just different and if you want to do some extra work with the lists, Streams will provide you more alternatives (filter, map, reduce, etc.)
List<String> listA = Stream.of("a", "B", "C").collect(Collectors.toList());
List<Integer> listB = IntStream.range(10, 20).boxed().collect(Collectors.toList());
List<Double> listC = DoubleStream.generate(() -> { return new Random().nextDouble(); }).limit(10).boxed().collect(Collectors.toList());
LinkedList<Integer> listD = Stream.iterate(0, x -> x++).limit(10).collect(Collectors.toCollection(LinkedList::new));
Upvotes: 7
Reputation: 114530
Since Java 7 you have type inference for generic instance creation, so there is no need to duplicate generic parameters on the right hand side of the assignment:
List<String> list = new ArrayList<>();
A fixed-size list can be defined as:
List<String> list = Arrays.asList("foo", "bar");
For immutable lists you can use the Guava library:
List<String> list = ImmutableList.of("foo", "bar");
Upvotes: 23
Reputation: 550
List arrList = new ArrayList();
Its better you use generics as suggested below:
List<String> arrList = new ArrayList<String>();
arrList.add("one");
Incase you use LinkedList.
List<String> lnkList = new LinkedList<String>();
Upvotes: 5
Reputation: 1762
List<Object> nameOfList = new ArrayList<Object>();
You need to import List
and ArrayList
.
Upvotes: 6
Reputation: 29443
Using Google Collections, you could use the following methods in the Lists class
import com.google.common.collect.Lists;
// ...
List<String> strings = Lists.newArrayList();
List<Integer> integers = Lists.newLinkedList();
There are overloads for varargs initialization and initialising from an Iterable<T>
.
The advantage of these methods is that you don't need to specify the generic parameter explicitly as you would with the constructor - the compiler will infer it from the type of the variable.
Upvotes: 7
Reputation: 533780
There are many ways to create a Set and a List. HashSet and ArrayList are just two examples. It is also fairly common to use generics with collections these days. I suggest you have a look at what they are
This is a good introduction for java's builtin collections. http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/technotes/guides/collections/overview.html
Upvotes: 5
Reputation: 2190
//simple example creating a list form a string array
String[] myStrings = new String[] {"Elem1","Elem2","Elem3","Elem4","Elem5"};
List mylist = Arrays.asList(myStrings );
//getting an iterator object to browse list items
Iterator itr= mylist.iterator();
System.out.println("Displaying List Elements,");
while(itr.hasNext())
System.out.println(itr.next());
Upvotes: 21
Reputation: 946
List is just an interface just as Set.
Like HashSet is an implementation of a Set which has certain properties in regards to add / lookup / remove performance, ArrayList is the bare implementation of a List.
If you have a look at the documentation for the respective interfaces you will find "All Known Implementing Classes" and you can decide which one is more suitable for your needs.
Chances are that it's ArrayList.
Upvotes: 20
Reputation: 40356
Sometimes - but only very rarely - instead of a new ArrayList, you may want a new LinkedList. Start out with ArrayList and if you have performance problems and evidence that the list is the problem, and a lot of adding and deleting to that list - then - not before - switch to a LinkedList and see if things improve. But in the main, stick with ArrayList and all will be fine.
Upvotes: 9
Reputation: 10996
First read this, then read this and this. 9 times out of 10 you'll use one of those two implementations.
In fact, just read Sun's Guide to the Collections framework.
Upvotes: 30
Reputation: 24946
One example:
List somelist = new ArrayList();
You can look at the javadoc for List and find all known implementing classes of the List
interface that are included with the java api.
Upvotes: 9