CODEWITHSUNDEEP
haskelltemplate-haskell
user1002430
user1002430

Reputation:

Template Haskell data declarations that derive Show

The following doesn't compile:

import Language.Haskell.TH
makeAlpha n = [d| data Alpha = Alpha $(conT n) deriving (Show, Read) |]

I can't make out what the error means at all:

Can't derive instances where the instance context mentions
type variables that are not data type parameters
  Offending constraint: Show t_d
When deriving the instance for (Show Alpha)
In the Template Haskell quotation
  [d| data Alpha = Alpha $(conT n) deriving (Show, Read) |]
In the expression:
  [d| data Alpha = Alpha $(conT n) deriving (Show, Read) |]

Is it possible to do derivations like this?

Upvotes: 8

Views: 400

Answers (1)

hammar
hammar

Reputation: 139840

This problem arises because TH quotes are type checked when they are compiled, with splices replaced by variables. This is usually a good idea, because it allows many kinds of problems to be detected before the splice is run, but in some cases this can make the compiler wrongfully reject a splice that would generate valid code.

In this case, this means that the compiler tries to check this code:

data Alpha = Alpha t deriving (Show, Read)

This doesn't work because the derived Show and Read instances need to use Show and Read for t, but since t is not a type parameter of Alpha, it cannot add the necessary constraints. Of course, when this splice is run, t is replaced by a concrete type, so the appropriate instances will be available without the need for any constraints, so this is one of the cases where the compiler is being over-cautious.

The workaround is to not use quoting, but instead use TH combinators, which are not subject to these extra checks. It's messy, but it works:

makeAlpha n = sequence [dataD (cxt []) alpha []
                [normalC alpha [strictType notStrict (conT n)]] [''Show, ''Read]]
  where alpha = mkName "Alpha"

There has been some talk about relaxing the checks done on quotes, but for now you'll just have to deal with it.

Upvotes: 7

Related Questions