Reputation: 6939
I have a Seam 2.2 based Java EE 5 web application with a bunch of tables mapped to JPA 1.0 Entities via Hibernate 3.3.3. During development it's running on a Tomcat 6, Oracle 10 XE and Windows 7.
Now, we had the request by operations department to split the data model into one schema being the owner of all database objects (myschema
) and one schema acting as the application's database user (myschema_app
). So I did the following:
myschema_app
myschema
(both regular ones and n:m intermediate tables) and sequences depending on the usage (one or more of select
, insert
, update
, delete
) to myschema_app
myschema_app
in order to use the same names than before and hiding the other schema's name prefixhibernate.default_schema
to new schema name in persistence.xml
context.xml
When I start the application while having hibernate.hbm2ddl.auto
set to validate
, I get an exception when the framework tries to create the EntityManagerFactory
telling me that a table is missing. When I execute a select statement directly in an sql tool with myschema_app
connected, everything works fine.
I understood that using a synonym going on another table is transparent for the application. Has anyone an idea what I may have overlooked?
Upvotes: 13
Views: 11908
Reputation: 8402
I still had validation issues because my Oracle driver was not giving the right columns even after setting hibernate.synonyms=true
, so instead of disabling schema validation entirely I filtered the synonym table out:
In properties:
hbm2ddl.schema_filter_provider=my.path.to.MyCustomSchemaFilterProvider
Define schema filter provider:
package my.path.to;
..
public class MyCustomSchemaFilterProvider implements SchemaFilterProvider {
@Override
public SchemaFilter getCreateFilter() {
return MySchemaFilter.INSTANCE;
}
@Override
public SchemaFilter getDropFilter() {
return MySchemaFilter.INSTANCE;
}
@Override
public SchemaFilter getMigrateFilter() {
return MySchemaFilter.INSTANCE;
}
@Override
public SchemaFilter getValidateFilter() {
return MySchemaFilter.INSTANCE;
}
}
SchemaFilter:
..
public class MySchemaFilter implements SchemaFilter {
public static final MySchemaFilter INSTANCE = new MySchemaFilter();
@Override
public boolean includeNamespace(Namespace namespace) {
return true;
}
@Override
public boolean includeTable(Table table) {
if (table.getName().toLowerCase().equals("synonymtabletoexclude")){
return false;
}
return true;
}
@Override
public boolean includeSequence(Sequence sequence) {
return true;
}
}
This was based off of https://medium.com/@horiaconstantin/excluding-hibernate-entities-from-auto-generation-bce86f8e6d94
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 2485
As of 4.3.0, It is possible to set hibernate.synonyms=true
to solve your problem with synonyms.
References:
https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-orm/commit/1df4b2ea3c98c74f3b6bbd42e266ee5c7ad60d27
https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HHH-8183
https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-orm/pull/508
Upvotes: 5
Reputation: 691943
My guess is that hbm2ddl seaches specifically for tables, and not for synonyms, but that your application should indeed work as if the tables existed in the schema. Try to remove the hbm2ddl option and test your application.
EDIT: it seems my guess is true: https://forum.hibernate.org/viewtopic.php?p=2438033
Upvotes: 9