Reputation: 3964
If I have the next code:
class A(models.Model):
.....
class B(models.Model):
a = models.ManyToManyField(A)
The next queries get differents results:
B.objects.exclude(a__in=[7])
from django.db.models import Q
B.objects.exclude(Q(a__in=[7]))
Results:
Is it an error?, Is it known?
I add a verbose example, execute the next code
from django.contrib.auth.models import User, Group
u1 = User.objects.create(username='u1')
u2 = User.objects.create(username='u2')
u3 = User.objects.create(username='u3')
g1 = Group.objects.create(name='g1')
g2 = Group.objects.create(name='g2')
u1.groups.add(g1)
u2.groups.add(g2)
print User.objects.exclude(groups__in=[g1.pk])
print User.objects.exclude(Q(groups__in=[g1.pk]))
Upvotes: 1
Views: 188
Reputation: 3964
Now this is fixed in Django:
https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/17600
This was a django bug
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 239430
I'm not sure i'd call it an "error", but the two versions do send unique queries (Django 1.3.1).
Without Q
:
SELECT "auth_user"."id",
"auth_user"."username",
"auth_user"."first_name",
"auth_user"."last_name",
"auth_user"."email",
"auth_user"."password",
"auth_user"."is_staff",
"auth_user"."is_active",
"auth_user"."is_superuser",
"auth_user"."last_login",
"auth_user"."date_joined"
FROM "auth_user"
WHERE NOT ("auth_user"."id" IN
(SELECT U1."user_id"
FROM "auth_user_groups" U1
WHERE (U1."group_id" IN (2)
AND U1."user_id" IS NOT NULL)))
With Q
:
SELECT "auth_user"."id",
"auth_user"."username",
"auth_user"."first_name",
"auth_user"."last_name",
"auth_user"."email",
"auth_user"."password",
"auth_user"."is_staff",
"auth_user"."is_active",
"auth_user"."is_superuser",
"auth_user"."last_login",
"auth_user"."date_joined"
FROM "auth_user"
INNER JOIN "auth_user_groups" ON ("auth_user"."id" = "auth_user_groups"."user_id")
WHERE NOT ("auth_user_groups"."group_id" IN (2))
What's interesting is that if you use filter
instead of exclude
, they both send exactly the same query. Nevertheless, this may actually be intentional. Q
is never really used by itself (there's no point), so the query is probably pre-optimized for additional AND/OR/NOT relations. Whereas, the version without Q
is done, for all intents and purposes. If you really have a problem with this behavior, you can file a ticket, but I'd say just don't use Q
when you only have one.
Upvotes: 2