CODEWITHSUNDEEP
perlchomp
Bill
Bill

Reputation: 5772

chomp in perl not working as expected

I found a strange behavior of chomp in Perl and I am unable to comprehend why is chomp is working like this.

The following line does not work as expected

if ( chomp($str1) eq chomp($str2) )

But, the following works fine

chomp $str1;
chomp $str2;
if ( $str1 eq $str2 )

Can you please give some insight in this behavior of chomp?

Upvotes: 3

Views: 3388

Answers (4)

mik
mik

Reputation: 3905

Generally, you can use s,$/$,,r regex as a non-destructive chomp. It removes record separator $/ from the end of $_ or the string provided using =~, and returns the result without modifying anything. Your example would look like this:

if ( $str1 =~ s,$/$,,r eq $str2 =~ s,$/$,,r )

More formally the regex should be s,\Q$/\E$,,r, so $/ is not treated as regex. In paragraph mode the regex would need to be s,\n*$,,r. In slurp or fixed record mode the regex is not needed at all (chomp does nothing).

Upvotes: 0

tangent
tangent

Reputation: 561

I like the name chomp() it's sound tells you what it does. As @ruakh mentions it takes one or more arguments, so you can say:

chomp($str1,$str2);
if ( $str1 eq $str2 ) ...

You can also hand it an array of strings, like what you would get from reading a whole file at once, e.g.:

chomp(@lines);

Upvotes: 2

evil otto
evil otto

Reputation: 10582

chomp returns the number of characters removed, not the strings that have been chomped.

Upvotes: 2

user240438
user240438

Reputation:

chomp modifies its argument. It does not return a modified argument. The second example is, in fact, how you're supposed to use it.

edit: perldoc -f chomp says:

   chomp   This safer version of "chop" removes any trailing string that
           corresponds to the current value of $/ (also known as
           $INPUT_RECORD_SEPARATOR in the "English" module).  It returns
           the total number of characters removed from all its arguments.

Upvotes: 12

Related Questions