Reputation: 12721
I'm looking for a method in Ruby which is basically this:
io.ready_for_read?
I just want to check whether a given IO
object (in my case, the result of a popen
call) has output available, i.e. a follow up call io.read(1)
will not block.
These are the two options I see, neither of which I like:
io.read_nonblock
- too thin an abstraction of Unix read()
-- I don't want to deal with errno
error handling.
io.select
with timeout 0 -- obfuscates the purpose of this simple operation.
Is there a better alternative that I have overlooked?
Upvotes: 15
Views: 4129
Reputation: 1
On Windows I've seen some inconsistencies with IO/wait. The ruby I have here right now is:
ruby 1.9.2p136 (2010-12-25) [i386-mingw32]
On this one both nread and ready? are implemented, but they return erroneous results. On a different version that I was using ready? was still broken and nread didn't even exist.
One possibility is to use io.stat.size, which tells you the number of bytes available to read in an IO stream. http://www.ruby-doc.org/core/classes/File/Stat.html
The documentation suggests that it's for files, but I've used it on pipes connected to a separate process (via Ruby's Open3.popen3). It's worked for me so far.
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 7375
A bit late, but if you require 'io/wait'
, you can use ready?
to verify that the IO can be read without blocking. Granted, depending upon how much you intend on reading (and how you plan to do it) your IO object may still block, but this should help. I'm not sure if this library is supported on all platforms, and I also don't know why this functionality was separated from the rest of the IO library. See more here: http://ruby-doc.org/stdlib/libdoc/io/wait/rdoc/
Upvotes: 9
Reputation: 12721
I'm ready to conclude that no, there is no simple method to do this. Per Peter Cooper's suggestion, here is IO#ready_for_read?
:
class IO
def ready_for_read?
result = IO.select([self], nil, nil, 0)
result && (result.first.first == self)
end
end
Upvotes: 6