Reputation: 2521
Using just list_to_atom()
gives:
list_to_atom("hello").
hello
list_to_atom("Hello").
'Hello'
why the difference?
I am trying to format a string with numbers, strings and atoms as follows:
lists:flatten(io_lib:format("PUTVALUE ~p ~p", [list_to_atom("hello"), 40])).
"PUTVALUE hello 40"
lists:flatten(io_lib:format("PUTVALUE ~p ~p", [list_to_atom("Hello"), 40])).
"PUTVALUE 'Hello' 40"
what is the best way of doing this in Erlang?
Edit: To make the question clear, there are more values than the example above and in some cases the value can be a string or an atom, like
lists:flatten(io_lib:format("PUTVALUE ~p ~p ~p", [list_to_atom("hello"), X, 40])).
where the first parameter is always a string but X
can either be an atom or a string. The third parameter is always a number.
Upvotes: 10
Views: 14087
Reputation: 39
Erlang atoms always must start with a lower-case letter. That's why it is giving you a different result when you try to create an atom with the initial capital letter. It's creating an atom by adding the ' quotes because of the capital H.
Upvotes: -1
Reputation: 5998
You can use lists:concat for formatting such string
lists:concat(["PUTVALUE ",hello," ",40]).
Upvotes: 6
Reputation: 849
If you want to get a flat list for strings and integers, using ~s
and ~B
may be straitforward:
lists:flatten(io_lib:format("PUTVALUE ~s ~B", ["Hello", 40])).
Upvotes: 12
Reputation: 9858
In Erlang, an atom starts with a lowercase letter. For an atom to starts with an uppercase letter, it must be enclosed with single quotes.
http://www.erlang.org/doc/reference_manual/data_types.html#id66663
Upvotes: 13