Reputation: 91925
I'm attempting to read from a serial port a byte at a time. I've got the following code in my Console app:
// Open the serial port in 115200,8N1
using (SerialPort serialPort = new SerialPort("COM1", 115200,
Parity.None, 8,
StopBits.One))
{
serialPort.Open();
for (; ; )
{
int result = serialPort.ReadByte();
if (result < 0)
break;
Console.WriteLine(result);
}
}
I'm expecting this to loop round, dumping the bytes received to the screen (ignore for a moment that they'll be printed as integers; I'll deal with that later).
However, it just blocks on the ReadByte call and nothing happens.
I know that my serial device is working: if I use Tera Term, I see the data. If I use the DataReceived
event, and call SerialPort.ReadExisting
, then I can see the data.
However, I'm not bothered about performance (at least, not yet), and the protocol I'm implementing works better when dealt with synchronously.
So: what am I doing wrong? Why doesn't ReadByte
return?
Upvotes: 2
Views: 9456
Reputation: 13941
I think your loop breaks at first run (at start), when there is no data in buffer.
if (result < 0)
break;
Later loop is not running and you see no data on console.
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 4284
You could make the asynchronous behavior look synchronous by doing something like this, and calling WaitForData()
before each read:
static SerialPort port;
static AutoResetEvent dataArrived = new AutoResetEvent(false);
static void Main(string[] args) {
port = new SerialPort(...);
port.DataReceived += new SerialDataReceivedEventHandler(port_DataReceived);
port.Open();
WaitForData(1000);
int data = port.ReadByte();
Console.WriteLine(data);
Console.ReadKey();
}
static void WaitForData(int millisecondsTimeout) {
dataArrived.WaitOne(millisecondsTimeout);
}
static void port_DataReceived(object sender, SerialDataReceivedEventArgs e) {
dataArrived.Set();
}
This answer isn't as "correct" as finding and resolving the underlying problem, but could be the basis of a workaround.
I've seen some strange things with the SerialPort class, including the behavior you described. Keep in mind that the DataReceived event gets called on a secondary thread (see MSDN). You can get slightly better performance using lock() semantics with Monitor.Wait() and .Pulse(),as described here
If you're lazy, you could also try inserting a Thread.Sleep() line (e.g. 200ms) right before your call to ReadByte to see if it makes a difference. Also I could have sworn I once saw a case where a SerialPort that was blocking on ReadByte() in a Console app was ported to a WinForms app with no meaningful code changes and the problem went away. Didn't have a chance to thoroughly investigate, but you could see if you have any better luck under WinForms and then troubleshoot from there.
This answer is a little late, but I figured I'd chime in for the next person who gets stumped on this issue.
EDIT: Here's a handy WaitForBytes(count, timeout)
extension method that does a good job of filtering out the "infinite blocking" behavior you described.
Usage is: port.WaitForBytes(1)
to wait for 1 byte of data to arrive. Or for less overhead, use SerialPortWatcher.WaitForBytes(n)
instead.
using System;
using System.Diagnostics;
using System.IO.Ports;
using System.Threading;
public static class SerialPortExtensions {
/// <summary>
/// Wait for a specified number of bytes to arrive on the serial port, or until a timeout occurs.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="port">Serial port on which bytes are expected to arrive.</param>
/// <param name="count">Number of bytes expected.</param>
/// <param name="millisecondsTimeout">Maximum amount of time to wait.</param>
/// <exception cref="TimeoutException">Thrown if <paramref name="count"/> bytes are not received
/// within <paramref name="millisecondsTimeout"/> milliseconds.</exception>
/// <exception cref="ArgumentNullException">Thrown if <paramref name="port"/> is null.</exception>
/// <exception cref="ArgumentOutOfRangeException">Thrown if either <paramref name="count"/> or
/// <paramref name="millisecondsTimeout"/> is less than zero.</exception>
/// <exception cref="InvalidOperationException">Thrown if the serial port is closed.</exception>
/// <remarks>This extension method is intended only as an ad-hoc aid. If you're using it a lot,
/// then it's recommended for performance reasons to instead instantiate a
/// <see cref="SerialPortWatcher"/> instance for the lifetime of your SerialPort.</remarks>
public static void WaitForBytes(this SerialPort port, int count, int millisecondsTimeout) {
if (port == null) throw new ArgumentNullException("port");
if (port.BytesToRead >= count) return;
using (var watcher = new SerialPortWatcher(port)) {
watcher.WaitForBytes(count, millisecondsTimeout);
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Wait for a specified number of bytes to arrive on the serial port, or until a timeout occurs.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="port">Serial port on which bytes are expected to arrive.</param>
/// <param name="count">Number of bytes expected.</param>
/// <exception cref="ArgumentNullException">Thrown if <paramref name="port"/> is null.</exception>
/// <exception cref="ArgumentOutOfRangeException">Thrown if either <paramref name="count"/> or
/// <paramref name="millisecondsTimeout"/> is less than zero.</exception>
/// <exception cref="InvalidOperationException">Thrown if the serial port is closed.</exception>
/// <exception cref="TimeoutException">Thrown if <paramref name="count"/> bytes are not received
/// within the number of milliseconds specified in the <see cref="SerialPort.ReadTimeout"/> property
/// of <paramref name="port"/>.</exception>
/// <remarks>This extension method is intended only as an ad-hoc aid. If you're using it a lot,
/// then it's recommended for performance reasons to instead instantiate a
/// <see cref="SerialPortWatcher"/> instance for the lifetime of your SerialPort.</remarks>
public static void WaitForBytes(this SerialPort port, int count) {
if (port == null) throw new ArgumentNullException("port");
WaitForBytes(port, count, port.ReadTimeout);
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Watches for incoming bytes on a serial port and provides a reliable method to wait for a given
/// number of bytes in a synchronous communications algorithm.
/// </summary>
class SerialPortWatcher : IDisposable {
// This class works primarilly by watching for the SerialPort.DataReceived event. However, since
// that event is not guaranteed to fire, it is neccessary to also periodically poll for new data.
// The polling interval can be fine-tuned here. A higher number means less wasted CPU time, while
// a lower number decreases the maximum possible latency.
private const int POLL_MS = 30;
private AutoResetEvent dataArrived = new AutoResetEvent(false);
private SerialPort port;
public SerialPortWatcher(SerialPort port) {
if (port == null) throw new ArgumentNullException("port");
this.port = port;
this.port.DataReceived += new SerialDataReceivedEventHandler(port_DataReceived);
}
public void Dispose() {
if (port != null) {
port.DataReceived -= port_DataReceived;
port = null;
}
if (dataArrived != null) {
dataArrived.Dispose();
dataArrived = null;
}
}
void port_DataReceived(object sender, SerialDataReceivedEventArgs e) {
// This event will occur on a secondary thread. Signal the waiting thread (if any).
// Note: This handler could fire even after we are disposed.
// MSDN documentation describing DataReceived event:
// http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.io.ports.serialport.datareceived.aspx
// Links discussing thread safety and event handlers:
// https://stackoverflow.com/questions/786383/c-events-and-thread-safety
// http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/37474/Threadsafe-Events.aspx
// Note that we do not actually check the SerialPort.BytesToRead property here as it
// is not documented to be thread-safe.
if (dataArrived != null) dataArrived.Set();
}
/// <summary>
/// Blocks the current thread until the specified number of bytes have been received from the
/// serial port, or until a timeout occurs.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="count">Number of bytes expected.</param>
/// <param name="millisecondsTimeout">Maximum amount of time to wait.</param>
/// <exception cref="ArgumentOutOfRangeException">Thrown if either <paramref name="count"/> or
/// <paramref name="millisecondsTimeout"/> is less than zero.</exception>
/// <exception cref="InvalidOperationException">Thrown if the serial port is closed, or if this
/// <see cref="SerialPortWatcher"/> instance has been disposed.</exception>
/// <exception cref="TimeoutException">Thrown if <paramref name="count"/> bytes are not received
/// within the number of milliseconds specified in the <see cref="SerialPort.ReadTimeout"/> property
/// of <paramref name="port"/>.</exception>
public void WaitForBytes(int count, int millisecondsTimeout) {
if (count < 0) throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException("count");
if (millisecondsTimeout < 0) throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException("millisecondsTimeout");
if (port == null) throw new InvalidOperationException("SerialPortWatcher has been disposed.");
if (!port.IsOpen) throw new InvalidOperationException("Port is closed");
if (port.BytesToRead >= count) return;
DateTime expire = DateTime.Now.AddMilliseconds(millisecondsTimeout);
// Wait for the specified number of bytes to become available. This is done primarily by
// waiting for a signal from the thread which handles the DataReceived event. However, since
// that event isn't guaranteed to fire, we also poll for new data every POLL_MS milliseconds.
while (port.BytesToRead < count) {
if (DateTime.Now >= expire) {
throw new TimeoutException(String.Format(
"Timed out waiting for data from port {0}", port.PortName));
}
WaitForSignal();
}
}
// Timeout exceptions are expected to be thrown in this block of code, and are perfectly normal.
// A separate method is used so it can be marked with DebuggerNonUserCode, which will cause the
// debugger to ignore these exceptions (even if Thrown is checkmarked under Debug | Exceptions).
[DebuggerNonUserCode]
private void WaitForSignal() {
try {
dataArrived.WaitOne(POLL_MS);
} catch (TimeoutException) { }
}
}
Upvotes: 3